boris ryser
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:47 am Post subject: [Sahara-Update] Concerned Africa Scholars: What Should the U |
 |
|
What Should the United States Do in Western Sahara?
By Jacob Mundy
Concerned Africa Scholars
13 October 2008
A recent opinion piece by five former U.S. ambassadors to Morocco ('A
Seismic Shift in U.S. North African Policy', Middle East Times, 6 October
2008) strongly supported a Moroccan proposal to offer the disputed territory
of Western Sahara limited autonomy.
Morocco invaded the territory in 1975 against the wishes of the native
Sahrawi population, who have been fighting for independence since 1973, when
Western Sahara was a Spanish colony. In 1991, the UN Security Council sent a
mission to Western Sahara to organize a referendum on independence, yet
Morocco has refused to allow such a vote. Instead Morocco has 'offered'
Western Sahara autonomy, despite the fact that no country in the world has
recognized Moroccan sovereignty over the Colorado-sized territory.
The former Ambassador's pro-Morocco argument is ostensibly based upon
'realism' and what is in the U.S. interest. However, their self-interest
certainly comes into play. In recent years, Morocco has spent millions of
dollars lobbying in Washington to cover up its illegal occupation and dismal
human rights record in Western Sahara - one of the 'worst of the worst'
according to Freedom House.
[The 2008 Robert F Kennedy Human Rights Awards has gone to Aminatou Haidar,
a Western Saharan rights campaigner and former victim of Morocco's policy of
"disappearing" pro-independence Sahrawis]
Autonomy is not the most realistic solution for Western Sahara because it
will require an expensive international peacekeeping force to guarantee the
safety of the population and mutual implementation of the agreement.
Considering the lack of resources to stop genocide in Darfur, is there
really enough international will for an even more robust intervention into
Western Sahara?
This, however, assumes Morocco and the Western Saharan independence movement
can reach an agreement in the first place. In the case of Israel and the
Palestinians, at least there is the fundamental agreement on a two-state
solution. In Western Sahara, there is no fundamental agreement.
The Bush administration has recently claimed that an independent Western
Sahara is not in the U.S. interest because it would be weak. Western Sahara
is a vast desert territory, but it will have a significant resource base
from which to build an economy: some of the world's highest grade phosphate
deposits, the richest fishing grounds in Africa and various other untapped
resources (e.g., hydrocarbons). In terms of government, the Western Saharan
independence movement has embraced multi-party democracy and free market
capitalism.
The question of viability is more than a function of per capita GDP. There
are plenty of densely populated countries that are unstable and poor, just
as there are very wealthy nations with small populations.
Viability depends largely on the policies of the international community and
neighboring states. The case of Chad is a prime example. Though it is a
poor, landlocked country, competing interests (e.g., French, Libyan and
international oil companies) are a significant factor in that country's
problems. During the Cold War, Somalia - synonymous with 'instability' - was
the site of some of the most intense U.S.-Soviet rivalry. After being
ignored for a decade in the wake of the 1993 'Blackhawk Down' incident,
Somalia is now a front in the war on terror, with regional rival Ethiopia
playing a proxy role for the White House. Mauritania, Western Sahara's
southern neighbor, is also a sparsely populated Saharan country. In the past
three years, Mauritania has suffered two coup d'états amidst increasing
terrorist activity within and across its porous borders. Yet neighboring
Morocco has supported the recent toppling of Mauritania's first
democratically elected president, just to bolster its strategic position in
Western Sahara.
The Western Sahara independence movement is quite aware of the fact that it
needs strong support from Washington. For that reason, they have developed
bipartisan support in the U.S. congress. They also accepted a 2003 peace
proposal designed by then UN envoy, former U.S. Secretary of State James
Baker. Morocco, knowing full well that Baker's proposed referendum would
lead to Western Sahara's independence, refused to cooperate, forcing Baker
to resign in 2004.
The problem for U.S. interests is Morocco's instability not Western Sahara's
viability. The legitimacy of the authoritarian monarchy in Morocco is
partially based upon its conquest of Western Sahara. Should Western Sahara
achieve independence, France and the United States have long worried that
the monarchy will fall. Yet Western Saharan nationalists will not accept
direct Moroccan rule and give up their internationally recognized rights
because it is supposedly not in the U.S. interest.
The last thing Western Sahara needs is pro-Moroccan lobbying disguised as a
compassionate call for peace. Cheerleading from former U.S. officials who
are either in the pay of the Moroccan monarchy (e.g., the Moroccan-American
Center for Policy) or to have business interests in Morocco will only
exacerbate the conflict by alienating Western Saharan nationalists from an
already fragile peace process. Calling on the UN to impose a solution
against the obvious wishes of the Western Saharans and against international
law reveals the moral bankruptcy of Morocco's Washington proxies.
If they were truly interested in peace, they would support the long-held
U.S. position in support of self-determination for Western Sahara.
Originally published by Peace Voice
___________________________________________________________________________
Source:
http://concernedafricascholars.org/what-should-the-united-states-do-in-western-sahara/
___________________________________________________________________________
Forwarded by:
Norwegian Support Committee for Western Sahara
*** Referendum now! ***
www.vest-sahara.no
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sahara-update |
|
