princeandy
Guest
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 4:17 pm Post subject: Re: Zionists and false flag terrorism |
 |
|
"VTR" <vexjorge@gmx.us> wrote in message
news:XeqdnXsYgMzI_kPVnZ2dnUVZ_uednZ2d@comcast.com...
| Quote: |
http://www.livevideo.com/video/A2214E0699224544A16DE7854C5709DA/9-11-missing-links-1-of-6-.aspx?lastvcid=773226
|
And of course if we swallow the holocaust myth we are nicely sliced into
dont talk to corrupt Europeans unless of course they are jewish, then you
can believe they are pure as the driven snow and jews worldwide always keep
in touch.
President Andrew Jackson, the only one of our presidents whose
administration totally abolished the National Debt, condemned the
international bankers as a "den of vipers" which he was determined to "rout
out" of the fabric of American life. Jackson claimed that if only the
American people understood how these vipers operated on the American scene
"there would a revolution before morning."
Hoodwinked and hi jacked by Rothschild?
The establishment Times of London stated: "If that mischievous financial
policy which had its origin in the North American Republic [i.e. honest
Constitutionally authorized no debt money] should become indurated down to a
fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost. It
will pay off its debts and be without a debt [to the international bankers].
It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of the civilized
governments of the world. The brains and wealth of all countries will go to
North America. That government must be destroyed or it will destroy every
monarchy on the globe."
The Rothschilds and their friends sent in their financial termites to
destroy America because it was becoming "prosperous beyond precedent."
In December, 1861, large numbers of European Troops (British, French and
Spanish) poured into Mexico in defiance of the Monroe Doctrine. This,
together with widespread European aid to the Confederacy strongly indicated
that the Crown was preparing to enter the war. The outlook for the North,
and the future of the Union, was bleak indeed.
In this hour of extreme crisis, Lincoln appealed to the Crown's perennial
enemy, Russia, for assistance. When the envelope containing Lincoln's urgent
appeal was given to Czar Alexander II, he weighed it unopened in his hand
and stated: "Before we open this paper or know its contents, we grant any
request it may contain."
Unannounced, a Russian fleet under Admiral Liviski, steamed into New York
harbor on September 24, 1863, and anchored there, The Russian Pacific fleet,
under Admiral Popov, arrived in San Francisco on October 12. Of this Russian
act, Gideon Wells said: "They arrived at the high tide of the Confederacy
and the low tide of the North, causing England and France to hesitate long
enough to turn the tide for the North" (Empire of "The City," p. 90).
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/slavery.htm
Congressman Charles Lindbergh put his finger firmly on the truth when he
stated,
just after the 'Federal' Reserve Act was passed by a depleted Congress
ALIEN CONTROL
Is US like Germany of the '30s? Published on Friday, June 11, 2004 by the
Chicago Sun Times by Andrew Greeley
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0611-10.htm
The Daily Mail reported on 10 July 1933:
'The German nation, moreover, was rapidly falling under the control of its
alien elements. In the last days of the pre-Hitler regime there were twenty
times as many Jewish government officials in Germany as had existed before
the war. Israelites of international attachments were insinuating themselves
into key positions in the German administrative machine.'
Resentment and resistance began to build up against the alien horde and in
the year before Adolf Hitler came to power Bernard Lecache, President of the
World Jewish League, stated:
'Germany is our public enemy number one. It is our object to declare war
without mercy against her.'
On that same day, 24 March 1933, on the front page of the London Daily
Express appeared the main headlines: "Judaea declares war on Germany: Jews
of all the world unite", and followed with:
'The Israelite people of the entire world declare economic and financial war
on Germany. The appearance of the Swastika as the symbol of the new Germany
revives the old war symbol of the Jews. Fourteen million Jews stand as one
body to declare war on Germany. The Jewish wholesale dealer leaves his
business, the banker his bank, the shopkeeper his shop, the beggar his
miserable hut in order to combine forces in the holy war against Hitler's
people.'
The Jews declared war against Germany
On March 24, 1933, the Jewish World Congress, then under the leadership of
Chaim Weizman, declared war on Germany on behalf of the Jews of the world.
http://www.barossa-region.org/Australia/Holocaust-Calendar--July-1.html
http://www.nnseek.com/e/soc.culture.usa/the_jews_declared_...ch_24_1933_11619679m.html
The German government was removing Jews from influential positions and
transferring power back to the German people. This declaration of war by the
Jews on Germany was repeated throughout the world. The first boycott of
Jewish business concerns came after this Jewish declaration of war in April
1933.
http://www.historiography-project.org/misc/encampment.html
| Quote: |
Do try to keep up.
|
http://www.rense.com/general45/zzo.htm
The Zionist Jewish Role In - Causing World War II
"In 1941, a Jewish writer, Theodor N. Kaufman, wrote Germany Must Perish.
Kaufman set out a plan for the total destruction of the German population by
a very simple method: the mass sterilisation of all German men and women
between the age of puberty and sixty years."
From a pre-1993 edition of John Tyndall's Spearhead magazine
12-9-3
http://www.jca.apc.org/~altmedka/2003eng/engl-030617-5.html
Why Hitler Came to Power:
One Rabbi's Explanation - By Rabbi Dr. Manfred Reifer - We played with the
most holy possessions of the people and at times made fun of all that was
sacred to the nation
http://www.heretical.com/mkilliam/wwii.html
That second war was later made certain, not by the intentions of Hitler but
by the determination of his eternal enemies to destroy the new Germany that
he had created.
By the Treaty of Versailles on 28 June 1919 and the Treaty of St. Germain on
20 September of the same year, the German people were thoroughly humiliated.
The British Prime Minister, Lloyd George, wrote:
'The international bankers swept statesmen, politicians, journalists and
jurists all to one side and issued their orders with the imperiousness of
absolute monarchs.'
However, the Four Nations Pact was not to be. The Jews put an end to this,
for on 7 November 1938, a few weeks after the Munich Agreement and shortly
before the journey to Paris of the German Foreign Minister, Von Ribbentrop,
the Polish Jew, Herschel Feibel Grynszpan murdered the German Third
Secretary of State, Ernst von Rath, in the German Embassy in Paris. The five
bullets fired were the logical result of the Jews' declaration of war on
Germany of March 1933 and put an end to the effort being made to explain and
extend the importance of the Munich Agreement and the revision of the Treaty
of Versailles.
This assassination provoked anti-Jewish riots in Germany, with the burning
of synagogues and the looting and burning of Jewish shops. The anti-Jewish
riots inflamed public opinion in Great Britain and the USA against
Chamberlain's efforts to relieve Anglo-German tension. In the United States
Germans were assaulted and persecuted. The Jews began leaving Germany.
The Paris magazine L'Ami du Peuple wrote about them:
'These people fled from Germany because they attempted to set up a rule of
fire and blood and to let loose the horrors of civil war and universal
chaos.'
The American Secretary of State, James Forrestal, who later died in
mysterious circumstances, wrote in his Forrestal Diaries (Cassel and Co.,
London 1952):
'Have played golf with Joe Kennedy [US Ambassador in Britain, father of
President John Kennedy]. According to him, Chamberlain declared that Zionism
and world Jewry have obliged England to enter the war.'
The Jew, Schlomo Asch, in a pep talk to French troops in the line in Le
Nouvelles Litteraires (10 February 1940) wrote:
'This is our war and you are fighting it for us. Even if we Jews are not
bodily in the trenches we are nevertheless morally with you.'
On 8 October 1942 Sentinel magazine stated unequivocally:
'The Second World War is being fought for the defence and fundamentals of
Judaism.'
AMAZING ISNT IT??
WELL FOR YOU DRAGGING YOUR FEET READ ON TO BECOME WILLING SCAPEGOATS.
http://atheism.about.com/b/a/057831.htm?terms=published+book
thousands of Jews were not bothered by the Nazis or by the fate of their
"convicted" co-religionists. They went on with their daily lives in Germany
while the world was running amok about the "harsh treatment of Jews in
Germany." To illustrate the true "fate of the Jews," one has to look at some
of the prominent Jewish leaders living in Germany at the time.
These are very important questions, because so many prominent Jews survived
the alleged Holocaust. Simon Wiesenthal, Eli Wiesel, Leo Baeck, Max
Nussbaum, and so many more like them. As a matter of fact, approximately 4.5
million Jews "survived."
Why did Rabbi Baeck never leave the Third Reich, the land of concentration
camps and "gas chambers," with all the other 300,000 German Jews who were
allowed to leave for more lucrative lands?
By all accounts, Rabbi Dr. Leo Baeck must have had a very comfortable
existence under the National Socialist Government in Germany. Born in 1873
in Posen, he became a Rabbi in 1897 in Oppeln/Silesia. Interestingly, he was
a Rabbi in Berlin from 1912 until 1943, when he himself was interned at the
Theresienstadt camp, a camp where most of the prominent Jews and resistance
activists were housed. After the war Leo Baeck immigrated to England.
Why did Rabbi Baeck never leave the Third Reich, the land of concentration
camps and "gas chambers," with all the other 300,000 German Jews who were
allowed to leave for more lucrative lands?
Another question should be put to all those false Holocaust "experts" by
asking them how many Jews were gassed in Dachau? As a matter of fact, no one
was ever "gassed" in Germany, or in territories under German control, as has
been established in court
Then, when hundreds of thousands of civilians died in massive Allied bombing
and only then ... Rabbi Baeck got out. And where did he go? To
Theresienstadt, because the concentration camp was never bombed by the
Allies, and was the safest place for a Jew to be.
Why did Rabbi Baeck never leave the Third Reich, the land of concentration
camps and "gas chambers," with all the other 300,000 German Jews who were
allowed to leave for more lucrative lands?
Russian troops marched into Berlin on April 24, 1945, they found 800 Jews
alive and well in Berlin's Jewish hospital.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/april/21/newsid_3560000/3560175.stm
http://www.nafcash.com/
Lest you think there must be some truth to the alleged Treblinka holocaust
NAFCASH TM is offering a $250,000.00 REWARD
For locating JUST ONE of the alleged "HUGE MASS GRAVES" of Treblinka
NAFCASH TM presents
THE TREBLINKA CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION CHALLENGE TM
You must scientifically - forensically prove the grave's EXACT location,
its EXACT dimensions and its EXACT volumetric density.
The cremated remains must total AT LEAST one percent of the alleged mass
murder.
JUST ONE MASS GRAVE! - JUST ONE PERCENT! |
|
Princeandy
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 8:17 am Post subject: Re: The Truth is NO Defence |
|
|
"B.H. Cramer" <bensalways@yourservice.com> wrote in message
news:7M2dnabJ0dPP42fVnZ2dnUVZ_uqdnZ2d@giganews.com...
| Quote: | A little something to prove what liars the Tim Miller wanker is.
When it comes to court cases involving yids and their b'ullshit, truth is
not a defence.
The truth is no defense in the Zundel case
http://www.nationalpost.com/home/story.html?id={9B4ABE18-360E-4F47-8F29-D24FAEA23905}
Top Nazi prosecutor assigned to Zundel case
Hearing begins today
Adrian Humphreys, National Post, Canada: Friday, February 28, 2003
The Department of Justice has assigned its top Nazi war crimes prosecutor
to represent the government at today's detention review hearing for
Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel, who is seeking refugee status in Canada.
Donald Macintosh, a senior federal government lawyer based in Toronto, has
handled several high-profile immigration cases in Canada that involved
allegations of war crimes committed in Europe during the Nazi era.
Dorette Pollard, director of communication for the Department of Justice,
said Mr. Macintosh's appointment is not necessarily because of his
experience in dealing with Nazi atrocities.
"It could simply be a question of workload. He is one of our capable
lawyers, as they all are, in our immigration section," Ms. Pollard said.
It is not usual practice, however, for senior federal lawyers to represent
the government at detention review hearings.
"Because of the nature of the case, a lawyer has been assigned," Ms.
Pollard said.
Mr. Zundel, 63, has remained in detention in Niagara Falls, Ont., since
United States immigration officials deported him to Ontario last week.
Mr. Macintosh has handled several of Canada's war crimes cases, including:
- Helmut Oberlander of Waterloo, Ont., who is awaiting a decision on his
appeal of a deportation order. He is accused of being a member of the
German Einsatzkommando, a Nazi squad that executed civilians, and then
lying about his role when entering Canada.
- Conrad Kalejs, accused of being a leader of the Latvian Arise Commando,
a group accused of murdering 20,000 Jews, was deported from Canada to
Australia in 1997.
- Johann Dueck was accused of being deputy chief of a police unit that
helped the Nazis round up and kill people in German-occupied Ukraine. He
was found not guilty in 1998 of obtaining his citizenship by false
representation and was later awarded $750,000 as compensation for the
prosecution.
Mr. Macintosh's experience and knowledge of the Nazi record make his
selection to handle Mr. Zundel's case a sound one, said Keith Landy,
national president of the Canadian Jewish Congress.
"Mr. Macintosh is well-known to us for the prosecution of Dueck, Kalejs,
Oberlander and others," Mr. Landy said.
"The more knowledgeable a person is to the views of the applicant it will
allow for a deeper and more thorough inquiry into the veracity of the
claims. And he is, by all accounts, a very professional and capable
prosecutor. "
Mr. Zundel's attempt to be granted refugee status in Canada has caused
outrage and officials in Ottawa are trying to ensure he does not resume
residency here, where he lived from 1958 until he left voluntarily in
2001.
During his time in Canada, he published Nazi and neo-Nazi views,
associated with white supremacists and sought publicity for his notion
that Germany has been wrongly accused of killing six million Jews.
ahumphreys@nationalpost.com
© Copyright 2003 National Post
|
Wonder if the restrictions on evidence are going to hobble as much as in
previous cases?
His attorney, Ludwig Bock, said he would appeal.
"What is notable is the iron-hard refusal of the court to allow
consideration of new scientific findings or expert opinions," Bock said.
http://www.newsvine.com/_news/2007/02/15/570024-holocaust-denier-gets-prison-in-germany
| Quote: | The Unraveling of the Witnesses at the First Zündel Trial (1985)
The important victory won by revisionism in France on April 26, 1983,
would go on to confirm itself in 1985 with the first Zündel trial in
Toronto. I would like to dwell a moment on this trial in order to
underscore the impact on one's point of view, and especially as far as
the testimonies on the Auschwitz gas chambers are concerned: for the
first time since the war, Jewish witnesses were subjected to a regular
cross-examination. Moreover, without wanting to minimize the
importance of the second Zündel trial (that of 1988), I should like it
to be understood that the 1985 trial already contained the seeds for
all that was attained in the 1988 trial, including the report by
Leuchter and all the scientific reports which, in the aftermath, would
proliferate in the wake of the Leuchter Report.
In 1985, as also afterwards in 1988, I served as advisor to Ernst
Zündel and his lawyer, Douglas Christie. I accepted this heavy
responsibility only under condition that all the Jewish witnesses
would, for the first time, be cross-examined on the material nature of
the reported facts, bluntly and without discretion. I had noted, in
effect, that from 1945 to 1985, Jewish witnesses had been granted
virtual immunity. Never had any defense lawyer thought or dared to ask
them for material explanations about the gas chambers (exact location,
physical appearance, dimensions, internal and external structure), or
about the homicidal gassing (the operational procedure from beginning
to end, the tools employed, the precautions taken by the executioners
before, during and after execution).
On rare occasions, as at the trial of Tesch, Drosihn and
Weinbacher,[5] lawyers formulated some unusual questions of a material
nature, hardly troublesome for the witness, but these always found
themselves on the fringes of the more fundamental questions which
should have been asked. No lawyer ever demanded clarifications on a
weapon which, indeed, he had never seen and that no one had ever shown
him. At the major Nuremberg Trial of 1945-46, the German lawyers had
manifested total discretion on this point. At the proceedings against
Eichmann in Jerusalem in 1961, the lawyer Dr. Robert Servatius had not
wanted to raise the question; in a letter on this subject dated June
21, 1974, he wrote me: "Eichmann hat selbst keine Gaskammer gesehen;
die Frage wurde nicht diskutiert; er hat sich aber auch nicht gegen
deren Existenz gewandt" [Eichmann himself had not seen any gas
chamber; the question was not discussed; but neither did he raise the
issue of their existence].[6]
At the Frankfurt Trial of 1963-65, the lawyers showed themselves to be
particularly timid. I should mention that the atmosphere was rather
inhospitable for the defense and the accused. This show trial will
remain as a blot on the honor of German justice as on the person of
Hans Hofmeyer, initially Landgerichtsdirektor, then Senatspräsident.
During more than 180 sessions, the judges and juries, the public
prosecutors and the private parties, the accused and their attorneys,
as well as the journalists who had come from around the world,
accepted as a complete physical representation of the 'crime weapon' a
mere map of the camp of Auschwitz and a map of the camp of Birkenau,
whereupon five minuscule geometric figures were inscribed for the
location of each of the alleged homicidal gas chambers, with the
words, for Auschwitz: "Altes Krematorium", and for Birkenau:
"Krematorium II", "Krematorium III", "Krematorium IV", and
"Krematorium V"! These maps[7] were displayed in the courtroom.
The Revisionists have often compared the Frankfurt trial with the
1450-1650 trials against witchcraft. Nevertheless, at least during
those trials, someone sometimes bothered to describe or depict the
witches' sabbath. At the Frankfurt trial, even among the lawyers who
made difficulties for a witness like Filip Müller, not one asked of a
Jewish witness or a repentant German defendant to describe for him in
greater detail what he was purported to have seen. Despite two
judicial visits to the scene of the crime at Auschwitz, accompanied by
some German lawyers, it seems not one of the latter insisted on any
technical explanations or criminological expertise regarding the
murder weapon. To the contrary, one of them, Anton Reiners, a
Frankfurt lawyer, pushed complacency to the point of having himself
photographed by the press while raising the chute cover by which the
SS supposedly sprinkled Zyklon B granules into the alleged Auschwitz
gas chamber.
And so at Toronto in 1985, I had fully decided to do away with these
anomalies, to break the taboo and, for starters, pose, or rather have
Douglas Christie pose, questions to the experts and Jewish witnesses
as one normally poses in every trial where one is supposed to
establish whether a crime has been committed and, if so, by whom, how
and when.
Fortunately for me, Ernst Zündel accepted my conditions and Douglas
Christie consented to adopt this course of action and to pose to the
experts and witnesses the questions that I would prepare for him. I
was convinced that, in this manner, all might change, and the veil
woven by so many false testimonies could be torn away. While I was not
counting on Ernst Zündel's acquittal and we were all resigned to
paying the price for our audacity, I nevertheless had hope that with
the aid of this far-sighted man of character, and thanks to his
intrepid lawyer, history, if not justice, would at last carry him into
historical prominence.
From the moment of the first cross-examination, a tremor of panic
began to creep its way amid the ranks of the prosecution. Every
evening and throughout most of the night, I would prepare the
questions to ask. In the morning, I would turn over these questions,
accompanied by the necessary documents, to lawyer Doug Christie who,
for his part and with the aid of his female collaborator, conducted
the essentially legal aspects of the effort. During the
cross-examinations, I maintained a position close to the lawyer's
podium and unremittingly furnished, on yellow notepads, supplementary
and improvisational questions according to the experts' and witnesses'
responses.
The expert cited by the prosecution was Dr. Raul Hilberg, author of
The Destruction of European Jews. Day after day, he was subjected to
such humiliation that, when solicited in 1988 by a new prosecutor for
a new trial against Ernst Zündel, Prof. Hilberg refused to return to
give witness; he explained the motive for his refusal in a
confidential letter wherein he acknowledged his fear of having to once
again confront the questions of Douglas Christie. From the
cross-examination of Dr. Raul Hilberg, it was definitively brought out
that no one possessed any proof for the existence either of an order,
a plan, an instruction, or a budget for the presumed physical
extermination of the Jews. Furthermore, no one possessed either an
expertise of the murder weapon (whether gas chamber or gas van), or an
autopsy report establishing the murder of a detainee by poison gas.
However, in the absence of evidence regarding the weapon and victim,
did there exist witnesses of the crime?
A testimony must always be verified. The usual first means of
proceeding to this verification is to confront the assertions of the
witness with the results of investigations or expert opinion regarding
the material nature of the crime. In the case at hand, there were
neither investigations, nor expertise relative to the alleged
Auschwitz gas chambers. Here is what made any cross-examination
difficult. Yet, this difficulty should not serve as an excuse, and one
might even say that a cross-examination becomes ever more
indispensable because, without it, there no longer remains any way of
knowing whether the witness is telling the truth or not.
Jewish Witnesses Finally Cross-Examined:
Arnold Friedman and Dr. Rudolf Vrba
For those persons interested in the technical and documentary means by
which we were nevertheless in a position to severely cross-examine the
two principal Jewish witnesses, Arnold Friedman and Dr. Rudolf Vrba, I
can do no better than to recommend a reading of the trial
transcript.[8] Pages 304-371 cover the questioning and
cross-examination of Arnold Friedman; the latter breaks down on pages
445-446 when he ends by acknowledging that he in fact saw nothing,
that he had spoken from hearsay because, according to him, he had met
persons who were convincing; perhaps, he added, he would have adopted
the position of Mr. Christie rather than that of these other persons
if only Mr. Christie had been able to tell him back then what he was
telling him now!
Dr. Vrba was a witness of exceptional importance. One might even say
about this trial in Toronto that the prosecution had found the means
of recruiting 'Holocaust' expert number one in the person of Dr. Raul
Hilberg, and witness number one in the person of Dr. Rudolf Vrba. The
testimony of this latter gentleman had been one of the principal
sources of the famous War Refugee Board Report on the German
Extermination Camps - Auschwitz and Birkenau, published in November
1944 by the Executive Office of President Roosevelt. Dr. R. Vrba was
also the author of I Cannot Forgive,[9] written in collaboration with
Alan Bestic who, in his preface, declares with regard to him:
"Indeed I would like to pay tribute to him for the immense trouble he
took over every detail; for the meticulous, almost fanatical respect
he revealed for accuracy." (p.2).
,Never perhaps, had a court of justice seen a witness express himself
with more assurance on the Auschwitz gas chambers. Yet, by the end of
the cross-examination, the situation had reversed itself to the point
where Dr. R. Vrba was left with only one explanation for his errors
and his lies: in his book he had, he confessed, resorted to "poetic
license" or, as he was wont to say in Latin, to "licentia poetarum"!
In the end, a bit of drama unfolded: Mr. Griffiths, the prosecutor who
had himself solicited the presence of this witness numero uno and yet
now apparently exasperated by Dr. Vrba's lies, fired off the following
question:
"You told Mr. Christie several times in discussing your book I Cannot
Forgive that you used poetic license in writing that book. Have you
used poetic license in your testimony?" (p. 1636).
The false witness tried to parry the blow but prosecutor Griffiths hit
him with a second question equally treacherous, this time concerning
the number of gassing victims which Vrba had given; the witness
responded with garrulous nonsense; Griffiths was getting ready to ask
him a third and final question when suddenly, the matter was cut short
and one heard the prosecutor say to the judge:
"I have no further questions for Dr. Vrba" (p. 1643).
Crestfallen, the witness left the dock. Dr. Vrba's initial
questioning, cross-examination and final questioning filled 400 pages
of transcripts (pp. 1244-1643). These pages could readily be used in
an encyclopedia of law under a chapter on the detection of false
witnesses.
The Prosecution Gives up on Calling Witnesses
Three years later, in 1988, during the second trial against Ernst
Zündel, the public prosecutor deemed it prudent to abandon any
recourse to witnesses. Canadian justice had apparently understood the
lesson of the first trial: there were no credible witnesses to the
existence and operation of the 'Nazi gas chambers'.
Little by little, every other country in the world has learned this
same lesson. At the trial of Klaus Barbie in France, in 1987, there
was talk about the gas chambers of Auschwitz but no one produced any
witnesses who could properly speak about them.[10] The attorney
Jacques Vergès, courageous yet not foolhardy, preferred to avoid the
subject. This was a stroke of luck for the Jewish lawyers who feared
nothing so much as to see me appearing at the side of Mr. Vergès. If
this gentleman had accepted my offer to counsel him, we in France
might have been able to strike a tremendous blow against the myth of
the gas chambers.
All the while in France, during several revisionist trials, Jewish
witnesses sometimes came to evoke the gas chambers but none of them
testified before the court as to having seen one or having
participated in a homicidal gassing by hauling bodies out of the 'gas
chambers'.
Today, gas chamber witnesses are making themselves extremely scarce
and the Demjanjuk trial in Israel, which once again has revealed how
much false testimony is involved in the matter, has contributed to the
suppression. Several years ago, it happened that I was aggressively
questioned at the rear of a law court by elderly Jews who presented
themselves as "living witnesses to the gas chambers of Auschwitz",
showing me their tattoos. It was necessary for me only to ask them to
look me in the eyes and to describe for me a gas chamber that
inevitably they retorted:
"How could I do this? If I had seen a gas chamber with my own eyes I
would not be here today to speak with you; I myself would have been
gassed also."
This brings us back, as one can see, to Simone Veil and her
declaration of May 7, 1983, about which we already know what we should
think.
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/
|
"Topaz" <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pklr449roj8r6c7ufl47es37l1bef7ahbe@4ax.com...
| Quote: |
"The orthodox holocaust story can not possibly be defended with
rational arguments because its absurdity is overwhelming. We are asked
to believe in the fata morgana of a vast slaughter in killing
factories which left no traces whatsoever - no documents, no bones, no
teeth, no ashes - nothing! We are further asked to believe that the
Allies, who had a large network of informers all over Europe and a spy
in the German leadership (Admiral Canaris, the head of the German
intelligence), did not become aware of this gigantic genocide until
the end of the war, for if they had known about the mass murder, they
would have acted to stop it. Finally, we are asked to believe that the
Jews in Poland, the epicentre of the holocaust, did not know anything
about the Auschwitz gas chambers as late as in August 1944, otherwise
the Jews from the Lodz ghetto would not have gone to Auschwitz
voluntarily - which is precisely what they did, as related by Raul
Hilberg in his standard work about the holocaust (Die Vernichtung der
europaeischen Juden, p. 543/544).
As the Zionist-controlled system of the "Western democracies" is
woefully unable to counter the revisionists with arguments, it resorts
to censorship and brute force in order to silence the dangerous
heretics. And the Jews are gradually transforming the holocaust into a
religion. This is a very clever strategy, for as Robert Faurisson
aptly remarks, one cannot refute a religion with scientific arguments.
Thus, the holocaust museums and holocaust monuments spreading like
mushrooms all over America and Europe are really temples of the new
religion, whereas professional "holocaust survivors" such as Elie
Wiesel are the priests of the new religion. To prove this assertion,
we only have to quote Wiesel himself: "The Holocaust is a holy
mystery, the secret of which is limited to the circle of the
priesthood of survivors" (Peter Novick, The Holocaust in American
Life, 1999, p. 211, 212, retranslated from the German). Another high
priest of the holocaust cult, Simon Wiesenthal, goes even further:
"When each of us comes before the Six Million, we will be asked what
we did with our lives... I will say: I did not forget you" (Simon
Wiesenthal in Response, Vol. 20, Nr. 1).
No critical questions about the holocaust are allowed because they are
a blasphemy: They cause immense distress to the eternal victims of
persecution, the Jews, and are an attempt to whitewash National
Socialism - the most evil ideology of all times which made the
holocaust possible! In today's Germany, it is even considered
inadmissible to compare the holocaust with the atrocities of communist
tyrants such as Stalin or Cambodian dictator Pol Pot because this is
regarded as a "relativisation" and "trivialization" of the worst crime
in history.
French Zionist propagandist Claude Lanzmann, the producer of a long
and unspeakably dull film about the holocaust (the title of this film
is Shoa, the Hebrew word for "catastrophe", which is often used by
Jews as a synonym for "holocaust") makes no effort to conceal that the
holocaust cult is to replace Christianity:
"If Auschwitz is something other than a horror of history, then
Christianity totters in its foundations. Christ is the Son of God, who
went to the end of the humanely endurable, where he endured the
cruellest suffering. (...) If Auschwitz is true, then there is a human
suffering with which that of Christ simply cannot be compared. (...)
In this case, Christ is false, and salvation will not come from him.
(...) Auschwitz is the refutation of Christ." (Les temps modernes,
Paris, December 1993, p. 132, 133.)
Nowadays, a large percentage of the Jews do not believe in God any
more, but virtually all of them believe in the Six Million. The
Zionist leadership cunningly exploits the holocaust to unite the
World's Jews by keeping them in a constant state of hysteria and
persecution mania, insinuating that only if the Jews stick together
will they be able to ban the threat of a new holocaust.
It goes without saying that very few Non-Jews are willing to embrace
the murky holocaust religion. While the overwhelming majority of
people in the West still believe that the official holocaust version
is essentially true (even if they suspect that the figures might me
somewhat inflated), they are thoroughly fed up with the eternal
lamentation about Jewish victims and Jewish suffering. They simply
don't want to hear it any more. In Germany, opinion polls showed that
a vast majority of the population was against the planned holocaust
monument in Berlin (which not a single major party, not a single
leading politician and not a single big newspaper dared to oppose).
Privately, the politicians are probably as profoundly disgusted with
the endless holocaust litany as the rest of the population, but they
cannot possibly afford to let the revisionists win because this would
shatter the very foundations of the "democratic" system to which they
own their careers and their wealth...
The ultimate weapon against Zionism and the state of Israel
At the end of the year 2000, Israel is a besieged country, but from
the military point of view, it is still vastly superior to its
neighbours, and it enjoys the unconditional support of the United
States. Should any of the Islamic states grow strong enough to
seriously threaten Israel, it would most probably be attacked and
militarily annihilated by America. Russia is not likely to risk a
confrontation with the USA for the sake of the Palestinians. We can
certainly admire the bravery of the Palestinians resistance fighters
who are willing to sacrifice their lives to liberate their homeland
from the alien intruders, but realistically, they have no chance to
win. The Palestinians have stones and slings. The Israelis have
helicopters and tanks. You can't destroy helicopters and tanks with
stones and slings.
When fighting one's enemy, one should always look for his weakest
spot. The weakest spot of Israel, its Achilles heel, is the holocaust
lie to which it owes its existence. The revisionists can give the
adversaries of Israel and international Zionism a terrible weapon. It
is quite true that many revisionists are by no means guided by
political considerations. Some of them - Carlo Mattogno is a good
example - are only motivated by intellectual curiosity: They want to
ascertain what really happened to the Jews during the Second World
War. But even if revisionism is not a political movement, its
political implications are tremendous. The revisionists are
endeavouring to find out the truth, and truth is the deadliest enemy
of Israel and international Jewry. Thus, the revisionists objectively
work against Israel and Zionism, even if subjectively their goals are
often purely scientific and devoid of any political ambition. This is,
of course, the reason why they are persecuted and their books burnt in
more and more countries.
In view of the total Jewish media control and the ever-growing
anti-revisionist repression in many Western countries, it is very
difficult indeed to achieve a revisionist breakthrough. We
revisionists are facing an uphill struggle which can only partly be
explained by our total lack of financial resources. Fortunately the
internet, which the Jews are unable to censure, has greatly improved
our possibilities to make the results of our research known to the
World, but all the same, we should not cherish naive illusions: Not
every citizen of the Western world who is informed about the
revisionist arguments will automatically become revisionist and
anti-Zionist. The average person in the West - and particularly in
Germany - has been so thoroughly brainwashed that a sudden exposure to
the truth can provoke a nervous breakdown or stomach cramps. I have
repeatedly witnessed this myself. Other people would gladly accept the
truth about the holocaust, but as they know that even the slightest
suspicion of revisionism leads to social ostracism, economic ruin and
legal persecution, they understandably prefer not to get involved.
However, if we want to win the war against those whom one of my
Russian friends called "the enemies of God and mankind"..
The logical consequence of all this is that those countries which are
authentically anti-Zionist and real friends of the oppressed
Palestinian people should make the breakthrough of holocaust
revisionism their foremost priority. A tank costs millions of dollars,
yet one soldier can destroy it with a single missile. The revisionists
can provide anti-Zionist freedom fighters with a weapon not even a
thousand missiles can destroy."
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/
http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
|
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/holohoax.htm
A look at these healthy happy jews will make you wonder just a little more
about the hardship claims.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article707229.ece
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/holohoax.htm |
|
