www.soproudlywehail.com

Leading Political Discussion,
News and information


Part of the Identityscape.com network...

getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

 

 

Who Wrote Dreams From My Father?
   So Proudly We Hail! - the Best of UseNet Political Postings! Forum Index -> Correct Politics Forum  
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Byron Dorgan
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 2:43 am    Post subject: Who Wrote Dreams From My Father? Reply with quote

Who Wrote Dreams From My Father?

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/who_wrote_dreams_from_my_fathe_1.html

October 09, 2008

By Jack Cashill

Prior to 1990, when Barack Obama contracted to write Dreams From My Father,
he had written very close to nothing. Then, five years later, this untested
33 year-old produced what Time Magazine has called -- with a straight
face -- "the best-written memoir ever produced by an American politician."


The public is asked to believe Obama wrote Dreams From My Father on his own,
almost as though he were some sort of literary idiot savant. I do not buy
this canard for a minute, not at all. Writing is as much a craft as, say,
golf. To put this in perspective, imagine if a friend played a few rounds
in the high 90s and then a few years later, without further practice, made
the PGA Tour. It doesn't happen.


And yet, given the biases of the literary establishment, no reviewer of note
has so much as questioned Obama's role in the writing, then or now. As the
New York Times gushed, Obama was "that rare politician who can write . . .
and write movingly and genuinely about himself." These accolades matter all
the more because Obama has built his political persona around his presumably
superior intellect, Dreams being exhibit A.


Shy of a confession by those involved, I will not be able to prove
conclusively that Obama did not write this book. As shall be seen, however,
there are only two real possibilities: one is that Obama experienced a near
miraculous turnaround in his literary abilities; the second is that he had
major editorial help, up to and including a ghostwriter.


The weight of the evidence overwhelming favors the latter conclusion and
strongly suggests who that ghostwriter is. In that this remains something
of a work in progress, I am willing to test my hypothesis against any
standard of proof and appreciate any and all good leads.


In my career in advertising and publishing, I have reviewed the portfolios
of a thousand professional writers, all of them crowded with writing
samples, but only a handful of these writers would have been capable of
having a written a book as stylish as Dreams. I have also written a book on
intellectual fraud, Hoodwinked, and examined any number of bogus biographies
that excited the literary left to the point of complicity, Edward Said's and
Rigoberta Menchu's prominent among them, Menchu winning a Nobel Prize for
hers. Obama's ascent seems to follow a century-old pattern.


Tracing Obama's literary ascent is complicated by what Politico.com calls a
"scant paper trail." That trail begins at Occidental College whose literary
magazine published two of Obama's poems -- "Pop" and "Underground" -- in
1981. Obama calls it some "very bad poetry," and he does not sell himself
short. From "Underground":


Under water grottos, caverns


Filled with apes


That eat figs.


Stepping on the figs


That the apes


Eat, they crunch.


The apes howl, bare


Their fangs, dance . . .



It would be another decade before Obama had anything in print and this an
edited, unsigned student case comment in the Harvard Law Review unearthed by
Politico. Attorneys who reviewed the piece for Politico described it as "a
fairly standard example of the genre."


Of note, Politico reporters Ben Smith and Jeffrey Resner observe that "the
temperate legal language doesn't display the rhetorical heights that run
through his memoir, published a few years later."


Once elected president of the Harvard Law Review --more of a popularity than
a literary contest -- Obama contributed not one signed word to the HLR or
any other law journal. As Matthew Franck has pointed out in National Review
Online, "A search of the HeinOnline database of law journals turns up
exactly nothing credited to Obama in any law review anywhere at any time."


A 1990 New York Times profile on Obama's election as Harvard's first black
president caught the eye of agent Jane Dystel. She persuaded Poseidon, a
small imprint of Simon & Schuster, to authorize a roughly $125,000 advance
for Obama's proposed memoir.


With advance in hand, Obama repaired to Chicago where he dithered. At one
point, in order to finish without interruption, he and wife Michelle
decamped to Bali. Obama was supposed to have finished the book within a
year. Bali or not, advance or no, he could not. He was surely in way over
his head.


According to a surprisingly harsh 2006 article by liberal publisher Peter
Osnos, which detailed the "ruthlessness" of Obama's literary ascent, Simon &
Schuster canceled the contract. Dystel did not give up. She solicited
Times Book, the division of Random House at which Osnos was publisher. He
met with Obama, took his word that he could finish the book, and authorized
a new advance of $40,000.


Then suddenly, somehow, the muse descended on Obama and transformed him from
a struggling, unschooled amateur, with no paper trail beyond an unremarkable
legal note and a poem about fig-stomping apes, into a literary superstar.


To be sure, it is not unusual for successful politicians to hire
ghostwriters -- John McCain gives due credit to Mark Salter for his memoir,
Faith of My Fathers -- but it is highly unusual for unknown young Chicago
lawyers to hire ghostwriters.


I have attempted to contact Dystel by phone and email without success. It
is highly unlikely she refashioned the book, and Osnos admittedly did not.
If my suspicions are correct, the ghost on this book shared many of Obama's
sentiments, spoke his language and spent considerable time reworking the
text.


I bought Bill Ayers' 2001 memoir, Fugitive Days, for reasons unrelated to
this project. As I discovered, he writes surprisingly well and very much
like "Obama." In fact, my first thought was that the two may have shared
the same ghostwriter. Unlike Dreams, however, where the high style is
intermittent, Fugitive Days is infused with the authorial voice in every
sentence. What is more, when Ayers speaks, even off the cuff, he uses a
cadence and vocabulary consistent with his memoir. One does not hear any of
Dreams in Obama's casual speech.


Obama's memoir was published in June 1995. Earlier that year, Ayers helped
Obama, then a junior lawyer at a minor law firm, get appointed chairman of
the multi-million dollar Chicago Annenberg Challenge grant. In the fall of
that same year, 1995, Ayers and his wife, Weatherwoman Bernardine Dohrn,
helped blaze Obama's path to political power with a fundraiser in their
Chicago home.


In short, Ayers had the means, the motive, the time, the place and the
literary ability to jumpstart Obama's career. And, as Ayers had to know, a
lovely memoir under Obama's belt made for a much better resume than an
unfulfilled contract over his head.


For simplicity sake, I will refer to the author of Dreams as "Obama."
Without question, he contributed much of the book's raw material, especially
the long-winded accounting of events and conversations, polished just well
enough to pass muster. The book's fierce, succinct and tightly coiled
social analysis more closely matches the style of Fugitive Days, a much
tighter book.


Ayers and Obama have a good deal in common. In the way of background, both
grew up in comfortable white households and have struggled to find an
identity as righteous black men ever since. Just as Obama resisted "the
pure and heady breeze of privilege" to which he was exposed as a child,
Ayers too resisted "white skin privilege" or at least tried to.


"I also thought I was black," says Ayers only half-jokingly. As proof of his
righteousness, Ayers named his first son "Malik" after the newly Islamic
Malcolm X and the second son "Zayd" after Zayd Shakur, a Black Panther
killed in a shootout that claimed the life of a New Jersey State Trooper.


Tellingly, Ayers, like Obama, began his career as a self-described
"community organizer," Ayers in inner-city Cleveland, Obama in inner-city
Chicago. In short, Ayers was fully capable of crawling inside Obama's head
and relating in superior prose what the Dreams' author calls a "rage at the
white world [that] needed no object."


Indeed, in Dreams, it is on the subject of black rage that Obama writes most
eloquently. Phrases like "full of inarticulate resentments," "unruly
maleness," "unadorned insistence on respect" and "withdrawal into a smaller
and smaller coil of rage" lace the book.


In Fugitive Days, "rage" rules and in high style as well. Ayers tells of
how his "rage got started" and how it evolved into an "uncontrollable
rage -- fierce frenzy of fire and lava." Indeed, the Weathermen's inaugural
act of mass violence was the "Days of Rage" in 1969 Chicago.


As in Chicago, that rage led Ayers to a sentiment with which Obama was
altogether familiar, "audacity!" Ayers writes, "I felt the warrior rising
up inside of me -- audacity and courage, righteousness, of course, and more
audacity." This is one of several references.


The combination of audacity and rage has produced two memoirs that follow
oddly similar rules. Ayers describes his as "a memory book," one that
deliberately blurs facts and changes identities and makes no claims at
history. Obama says much the same. In Dreams, some characters are
composites. Some appear out of precise chronology. Names have been
changed.


As a control, allow me to introduce my own book, Sucker Punch, which is no
small part a memoir about race, specifically in my relationship, at great
remove, with Muhammad Ali and the world of boxing. In the book, I describe
my own unreconstructed coming of age in racially charged Newark, New Jersey
as it happened. I change no names, create no composite characters, alter no
chronologies. Most memoirs observe the same conventions. Dreams and
Fugitive Days, however, are both suffused with repeated reference to lies,
lying and what Ayers calls, in his pitch perfect post-modern patois, "our
constructed reality."


"But another part of me knew that what I was telling them was a lie," writes
Obama, "something I'd constructed from the scraps of information I'd picked
up from my mother."


"That whole first year seemed like one long lie," Obama writes of his first
year in college in Los Angeles, one of at least a dozen references to lies
and lying in "Dreams," a figure nearly matched in "Fugitive Days."


The reader knows that Ayers -- with some justification -- has much to hide.
He senses that Obama does too, but he is never quite sure why. This
presumed poetic license leads to the frequent manipulation of dates to make
a political point.


"I saw a dead body once, as I said, when I was ten, during the Korean War,"
writes Ayers. This correlation is important enough that Ayers mentions it
twice. The only problem is that Ayers was eight when the Korean War ended.


Obama tells us that when he was ten, he and his family visited the mainland.
On the trip, back in their motel room, they watched the Watergate Hearings
on TV. The problem, of course, is that those hearing started just before
Obama turned twelve.


One could forgive a single missed date, but inconsistent dates and numbers
appear frequently in both books and often reinforce some moment of lost
innocence. In the same spirit, both books abound in detail too closely
remembered and conversations too well recorded. These moments in both books
occasionally lead to an awareness of the nation's seemingly ineradicable
racism.


In 1970, for instance, the 9-year-old Obama alleges to be visiting the
American embassy Indonesia. While waiting, he chances upon "a collection of
Life magazines neatly displayed in clear plastic binders."


In one magazine, he reads a story about a black man with an "uneven, ghostly
hue," who has been rendered grotesque by a chemical treatment. "There were
thousands of people like him," Obama learned, "black men and women back in
America who'd undergone the same treatment in response to advertisements
that promised happiness as a white person."


Obama's attention to detail is a ruse. Life never ran such an article. When
challenged, Obama claimed it was Ebony. Ebony ran no such article either.
Besides, black was beautiful in 1970.


In a similar vein, Ayers tells of hitching a ride in Missouri with "Bud,"
the driver of a "brand-new Peterbilt truck." The man proceeds to regale
Ayers with a string of dirty jokes -- at least two of them retold word for
word -- before reaching under his seat and pulling out a large pistol, his
"N****r neutralizer."


"White people can never quite remember the scope and scale of the
slavocracy," Ayers reminds the reader again and again, writing as though he
were not a member of this benighted race.


These parallels intrigue perhaps, but they prove little. To add a little
science to the analysis, I identified two similar "nature" passages in
Obama's and Ayers' respective memoirs, the first from Fugitive Days:


"I picture the street coming alive, awakening from the fury of winter,
stirred from the chilly spring night by cold glimmers of sunlight angling
through the city."


The second from Dreams:


"Night now fell in midafternoon, especially when the snowstorms rolled in,
boundless prairie storms that set the sky close to the ground, the city
lights reflected against the clouds."


These two sentences are alike in more than their poetic sense, their length
and their gracefully layered structure. They tabulate nearly identically on
the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), something of a standard in the field.


The "Fugitive Days" excerpt scores a 54 on reading ease and a 12th grade
reading level. The "Dreams'" excerpt scores a 54.8 on reading ease and a
12th grade reading level. Scores can range from 0 to 121, so hitting a
nearly exact score matters.


A more reliable data-driven way to prove authorship goes under the rubric
"cusum analysis" or QSUM. This analysis begins with the measurement of
sentence length, a significant and telling variable. To compare the two
books, I selected thirty-sentence sequences from Dreams and Fugitive Days,
each of which relates the author's entry into the world of "community
organizing."


"Fugitive Days" averaged 23.13 words a sentence. "Dreams" averaged 23.36
words a sentence. By contrast, the memoir section of "Sucker Punch"
averaged 15 words a sentence.


Interestingly, the 30-sentence sequence that I pulled from Obama's
conventional political tract, Audacity of Hope, averages more than 29 words
a sentence and clocks in with a 9th grade reading level, three levels below
the earlier cited passages from "Dreams" and "Fugitive Days." The
differential in the Audacity numbers should not surprise. By the time it
was published in 2006, Obama was a public figure of some wealth, one who
could afford editors and ghost writers.


The publisher of Dreams, the openly liberal Peter Osnos, tells how this came
to be. According to Osnos, Dreams took off during Obama's much-publicized
race for the U.S. Senate in 2004, nearly ten years after its modest release.
After winning the election, Obama dumped his devoted long time agent, Jane
Dystel, and signed a seven-figure deal with Crown, using only a by-the-hour
attorney.


Obama pulled off the deal before being sworn in as Senator, this way to
avoid the disclosure and reporting requirements applicable to members of
Congress. To his credit, Osnos publicly scolds Obama for his "ruthlessness"
and "his questionable judgment about using public service as a personal
payday."

Unfortunately, the technology is not currently available to do a fully
reliable authorship analysis. As expert in the field Patrick Juola of
Duquesne University observed, "The accuracy simply isn't there." He
cautioned that for high stakes issues like this one, "The repercussions of a
technical error could be a disaster (in either direction)."

That much said, preliminary QSUM analysis supports an Ayers-Obama link.
Systems designer Ed Gold--with twenty years of high-level experience in
image and signal processing, pattern recognition, and classifier design and
implementation--volunteered to run a QSUM scan on multiple excerpts from
both memoirs. "I have completed the analysis," he wrote me, "and I think you
will be pleased with the findings." In assessing the signature of sample
passages from Dreams, he found "a very strong match to all of the Ayers
samples that I processed."

Like Juola, Gold recognized the limitations of the process and of his own
resources. He has volunteered to make the raw data available to more
established authorship authentication experts, and I will be happy to pass
that data along. Gold saw the complementary value, however, in text
analysis, as did Juola, who encouraged me "to do what you're already doing .
.. . good old-fashioned literary detective work."

Given that advice, I dug deeper into both memoirs and established one
metaphoric thread that ties the two books together in a way I believe is
just shy of conclusive, a thread that leads back to Bill Ayers's stint,
after dropping out of college, as a merchant seaman.


"I'd thought that when I signed on that I might write an American novel
about a young man at sea," says Ayers in his memoir, Fugitive Days, "but I
didn't have it in me."


The experience had a powerful impact on Ayers. Years later, he would recall
a nightmare he had while crossing the Atlantic, "a vision of falling
overboard in the middle of the ocean and swimming as fast as I could as the
ship steamed off and disappeared over the horizon."


Although Ayers has tried to put his anxious ocean-going days behind him, the
language of the sea will not let him go. "I realized that no one else could
ever know this singular experience," Ayers writes of his maritime
adventures. Yet curiously, much of this same nautical language flows
through Obama's earth-bound memoir.


"Memory sails out upon a murky sea," Ayers writes at one point. Indeed,
both he and Obama are obsessed with memory and its instability. The latter
writes of its breaks, its blurs, its edges, its lapses. Obama also has a
fondness for the word "murky" and its aquatic usages.


"The unlucky ones drift into the murky tide of hustles and odd jobs," he
writes, one of four times "murky" appears in Dreams. Ayers and Obama also
speak often of waves and wind, Obama at least a dozen times on wind alone.
"The wind wipes away my drowsiness, and I feel suddenly exposed," he writes
in a typical passage. Both also make conspicuous use of the word "flutter."


Not surprisingly, Ayers uses "ship" as a metaphor with some frequency.
Early in the book he tells us that his mother is "the captain of her own
ship," not a substantial one either but "a ragged thing with fatal leaks"
launched into a "sea of carelessness."


Obama too finds himself "feeling like the first mate on a sinking ship." He
also makes a metaphorical reference to "a tranquil sea." More intriguing is
Obama's use of the word "ragged" as an adjective as in the highly poetic
"ragged air" or "ragged laughter."


Both books use "storms" and "horizons" both as metaphor and as reality.
Ayers writes poetically of an "unbounded horizon," and Obama writes of
"boundless prairie storms" and poetic horizons-"violet horizon," "eastern
horizon," "western horizon."


Ayers often speaks of "currents" and "pockets of calm" as does Obama, who
uses both as nouns as in "a menacing calm" or "against the current" or "into
the current." The metaphorical use of the word "tangled" might also derive
from one's nautical adventures. Ayers writes of his "tangled love affairs"
and Obama of his "tangled arguments."


In Dreams, we read of the "whole panorama of life out there" and in Fugitive
Days, "the whole weird panorama." Ayers writes of still another panorama,
this one "an immense panorama of waste and cruelty." Obama employs the word
"cruel" and its derivatives no fewer than fourteen times in Dreams.


On at least twelve occasions, Obama speaks of "despair," as in the "ocean of
despair." Ayers speaks of a "deepening despair," a constant theme for him as
well. Obama's "knotted, howling assertion of self" sounds like something
from the pages of Jack London's "The Sea Wolf."


In Obama's defense, he did grow up in Hawaii. Still, the short Hawaii
stretch of his memoir is largely silent on the island's natural appeal.
Sucker Punch again offers a useful control. It makes no reference at all,
metaphorical or otherwise, to ships, seas, oceans, calms, storms, wind,
waves, horizons, panoramas, or to things howling, fluttering, knotted,
ragged, tangled, or murky. None. And yet I have spent a good chunk of
every summer of my life at the ocean.


If there is any one paragraph in Dreams that has convinced me of Ayers'
involvement it is this one, in which Obama describes the Black Nationalist
message:


"A steady attack on the white race... served as the ballast that could
prevent the ideas of personal and communal responsibility from tipping into
an ocean of despair."


As a writer, especially in the pre-Google era of Dreams, I would never have
used a metaphor as specific as "ballast" unless I knew exactly what I was
talking about. Seaman Ayers most surely did.


One more item of interest. In his 1997 book, A Kind and Just Parent, Bill
Ayers walks the reader through his Hyde Park neighborhood and identifies the
notable residents therein. Among them are Muhammad Ali, "Minister" Louis
Farrakhan (of whom he writes fondly), "former mayor" Eugene Sawyer, "poets"
Gwendolyn Brooks and Elizabeth Alexander, and "writer" Barack Obama.

In 1997, Obama was an obscure state senator, a lawyer, and a law school
instructor with one book under his belt that had debuted two years earlier
to little acclaim and lesser sales. In terms of identity, he had more in
common with mayor Sawyer than poet Brooks. The "writer" identification
seems forced and purposefully so, a signal perhaps to those in the know of a
persona in the making that Ayers had himself helped forge.


None of this, of course, proves Ayers' authorship conclusively, but the
evidence makes him a much more likely candidate than Obama to have written
the best parts of Dreams.


The Obama camp could put all such speculation to rest by producing some
intermediary sign of impending greatness -- a school paper, an article, a
notebook, his Columbia thesis, his LSAT scores -- but Obama guards these
more zealously than Saddam did his nuclear secrets. And I suspect, at the
end of the day, we will pay an equally high price for Obama's concealment as
Saddam's.


Jack Cashill is the author, among other books, of Hoodwinked: How
Intellectual Hucksters Hijacked American Culture. He has a Ph.D. in
American studies from Purdue University.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
   So Proudly We Hail! - the Best of UseNet Political Postings! Forum Index -> Correct Politics Forum  
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum