| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
LeRoy Blue
Guest
|
 Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:39 am Post subject: Re: Yet another Gay victory |
 |
|
On 2008-08-18 21:33:53 -0400, "RamRod Sword of Baal"
<ramrod@truthonly.com> said:
| Quote: |
Slowly but surely the Gay and Lesbian persons of this world are gaining
equality, despite the RR and and Bigot Brigade's fighting tooth and
nail.
Once again there has been a small victory for truth and rights.
http://www.365gay.com/news/081808-lesbian-ivf/
|
My, my, you must have stopped reading before you got to this:
http://www.365gay.com/news/lesbian-moms-lawsuit/
By 365gay Newscenter Staff
07.24.2008 7:01pm EDT
(Canberra) An Australian court ruled Thursday that a lesbian couple
who had twins instead of a single child cannot sue the doctor who
performed in vitro fertilization on one of the women.
The couple, whose names cannot be published, filed a lawsuit against
Canberra obstetrician Sydney Robert Armellin seeking more than $400,000
for the lifetime care of the second child.
Armellin mistakenly implanted two embryos instead of the one that had
been sought.
The lawsuit, filed last year in the Supreme Court of the Australian
Capital Territory in Canberra, claims that as a result of the error and
the additional child, the birth mother is unable to maintain her
relationship with her same-sex partner.
The suit claimed that the birth of the second child created emotional
stress and the women cannot afford to bring up two children with a
combined income of just over $100,000.
The sperm used in the IVF treatment came from an anonymous Danish
donor. The twin girls that resulted are now four years of age.
The partner of the birth mother told the court that the stress caused
to the birth mother after learning she was about to have twins nearly
destroyed their relationship.
Before the twins came along, the mother was described as confident and
grounded and the women’s relationship strong.
Choking back tears the partner said that after the birth mother learned
she was carrying twins everything changed.
“I find that she doesn’t have the same ability to love that she used to
and the same capacity to, I guess, embrace differences and issues as a
couple or as a team,” she said.
The attorney for the defendant, Dr Sydney Robert Armellin, suggested to
the court that the problems faced by the couple were no different than
those encountered by most other couples who become new parents.
In her ruling, Justice Annabelle Bennett said that while the women had
expressed their desire for only one embryo to clinic staff, they had
not stated that directly to the doctor.
Therefore, she ruled, Bennett had not breached his duty and was not negligent.
-----------------
<SNIGGER> |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
LeRoy Blue
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:52 am Post subject: Re: Yet another Gay victory |
|
|
On 2008-08-19 15:49:32 -0400, "(`.Craig Chilton.) -- Rx for
HOMOSEXUALITY: Extinction!" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> said:
| Quote: | On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:01:54 -0500,
"Death" <Death@yourdoor.net> wrote:
"RamRod Sword of Baal" <ramrod@truthonly.com> wrote:
Slowly but surely the Gay and Lesbian persons of this
world are gaining equality, despite the RR and and Bigot
Brigade's fighting tooth and nail.
http://www.365gay.com/news/081808-lesbian-ivf/
Once again there has been a small victory for truth
and rights.
You spout more bullshit than CNN.
CNN deals with FACTS. If you want pure
bullsh*t, bigotry, drivel and lies, watch Faux News
with the rest of the bigoted losers of the RRR Cult.
|
What do *you* GET out of being a hateful bigot? What's IN that for
YOU? What do YOU
stand to GAIN by being such an ignorant loser?
| Quote: | xanadu222@mchsi.com -- E-Mail me...PLEASE! I'M LONELY
http://www.roadrat.com -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL AKA
"WHORE YOUR WAY ACROSS THE USA
http://apifar.blogspot.com -- Great TACTICS to Fight Anti-Bigotry.
http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Christianity *vs.* Bigotry
(A fruitless fight). |
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
LeRoy Blue
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:58 am Post subject: Re: Yet another Gay victory |
|
|
On 2008-08-20 22:40:46 -0400, "RamRod Sword of Baal"
<ramrod@truthonly.com> said:
| Quote: |
"Joe Fretzel" <jfretzel@nowhere.invalid> wrote in message
news:4b3eb5890a908266ecc6373c526d108d@teksavvy.com...
On Aug 20, 3:24 pm, juanjo <jonpe...@mindspring.com> wrote:
On Aug 20, 10:13 am, Joe Fretzel <jfret...@nowhere.invalid> shared
the
following with us:
On Aug 19, 7:29 pm, "RamRod Sword of Baal" <ram...@truthonly.com
wrote:
We only need to look at the latest poll numbers in California
where
it seems
51% believe that Gay people should be allowed to be married,
California is but a small part of the world and the people are
considered dangerously liberal and half crazy anyway. Look at the
leadership: ex "Governor Moonbeam" and now "The Governater" It's
the
perfect breeding ground for faggots, serial killers, terrorists and
various misfits.
California is the most populous state in the union. It is an
economic
engine that supplies the USA with over 20% of its economic growth.
You mean Mexicans picking oranges.
Laws passed in California have a very real tendency to show up in
other states as time goes by.
Yeah, like the "medicinal" marijuana law lol!
As for the rest of your screed, it is a
diatribe without substantiation.
Have you ever heard of:
Charlie Manson
The Nightstalker
The Zodiac Killer
The unnamed killer that butchered 15 women in Sonoma county
1972-1975
Another unnamed killer that sliced up 10 or more women 1985-1988
William Lester Suff 13+ kills
Hurbert Mullan 13 kills,
Donald Clark and Carol Bundy 6 kills
Gerald Parker 6+ kills
Laurence Bittaker
Ray Norris
Wayne Adam Ford
Richard Trenton Chase
Morris Solomon
Dorothea Puente
David Carpenter
Edward Kemper III
Herbert Mullan
William Bonan
Randy Craft
Douglas Gretzler
Willie Steelman
Leonard Lake
Charles Ng
Patrick Kearney
A partial list of Californias famous sons.
All Serial killers. You faggots are in excellent
company.
Why not go to the top of the tree, how about the right wing bigot and
religious nut Timothy James McVeigh, who killed 168 people and injured
800, not from California incidentally !!!!
Incidentally, you did say "California's famous sons" in reference to
the above list. So one would take that to mean they were born in
California, but :-
Charlie Manson was born Cincinnati
The Nightstalker was born in Texas
Donald Clark was born in Pennsylvania
Gerald Parker was born in New York
Laurence Bittaker was born in Pennsylvania
Morris Solomon was born Albany, Georgia
I did not check all of them less than half so I guess there would be a
lot more that were not 'California's famous sons'
|
But nuts roll down hill
| Quote: |
If you are going to come in here, please try and tell the truth as we
are not all as silly or stupid as you are.
|
Says the boy molester from Australia. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
(`.Craig Chilton.
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 12:16 pm Post subject: Re: Yet another Gay victory |
|
|
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 05:52:57 GMT,
TAYLOR -- (aka "LeRoy Blue" <leroyblue@pillon.net> ...
Usenet LOSER and all-around Moron, spewed
| Quote: | "(`.Craig Chilton.) -- Rx for the RRR Cult's Loathsome
Agendas: Extinction!" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> said:
"Death" <Death@yourdoor.net> wrote:
"RamRod Sword of Baal" <ramrod@truthonly.com> wrote:
|
| Quote: | Slowly but surely the Gay and Lesbian persons of this
world are gaining equality, despite the RR and and Bigot
Brigade's fighting tooth and nail.
http://www.365gay.com/news/081808-lesbian-ivf/
Once again there has been a small victory for truth
and rights.
You spout more bullshit than CNN.
CNN deals with FACTS. If you want pure
bullsh*t, bigotry, drivel and lies, watch Faux News
with the rest of the bigoted losers of the RRR Cult.
What do *you* GET out of being a hateful bigot? What's IN
that for YOU? What do YOU stand to GAIN by being such an
ignorant loser?
|
Gee! You're getting pretty good at that speech. Taylor. Isn't
amazing what lecturing into mirrors can accomplish?
-- Craig Chilton
xanadu222@mchsi.com -- To E-Mail me.
http://www.roadrat.com -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL.
http://apifar.blogspot.com -- Great TACTICS to Fight Bigotry.
http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Christianity *vs.* Bigotry. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
LeRoy Blue
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:09 pm Post subject: Re: Yet another Gay victory |
|
|
On 2008-08-24 08:09:09 -0400, "(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- Rx for RRR
Cult's Loathsome Agendas: Extinction!" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> said:
| Quote: | On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 05:52:57 GMT,
TAYLOR -- (aka "LeRoy Blue" <leroyblue@pillon.net> ...
Usenet LOSER and all-around Moron, spewed
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- Rx for the RRR Cult's Loathsome
Agendas: Extinction!" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> said:
"Death" <Death@yourdoor.net> wrote:
"RamRod Sword of Baal" <ramrod@truthonly.com> wrote:
Slowly but surely the Gay and Lesbian persons of this
world are gaining equality, despite the RR and and Bigot
Brigade's fighting tooth and nail.
http://www.365gay.com/news/081808-lesbian-ivf/
|
June 27, 2008 / 57(25);681-686
Trends in HIV/AIDS Diagnoses Among Men Who Have Sex with Men --- 33
States, 2001--2006
In 2008, CDC conducted an analysis of trends in diagnoses of human
immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS)
among men who have sex with men (MSM) in the 33 states* that have had
confidential, name-based HIV case reporting since at least 2001. This
report summarizes the results of that analysis, which indicated that
the number of HIV/AIDS diagnoses among MSM overall during 2001--2006
increased 8.6% (estimated annual percentage change [EAPC] = 1.5).
During 2001--2006, an estimated 214,379 persons had HIV/AIDS diagnosed
in the 33 states. Of these diagnoses, 46% were in MSM, and 4% were in
MSM who engaged in illicit injection-drug use (IDU) (i.e., MSM and
IDU). To reduce the impact of HIV/AIDS in the United States, HIV
prevention services that aim to reduce the risk for acquiring and
transmitting infection among MSM and link infected MSM to treatment
must be expanded.
In this report, HIV/AIDS refers to three categories of diagnoses
collectively: 1) a diagnosis of HIV infection (not AIDS), 2) a
diagnosis of HIV infection with subsequent AIDS diagnosis, and 3)
concurrent diagnoses of HIV infection and AIDS. Reporting cases of HIV
infection (not AIDS) and AIDS is now legally mandated in all U.S.
states, the District of Columbia, and five U.S. territories. The CDC
case definition for HIV infection (not AIDS) requires a positive test
result from an assay approved by the Food and Drug Administration that
demonstrates evidence of HIV infection; the case definition for AIDS
requires meeting the HIV infection (not AIDS) case definition, plus
diagnosis of at least one AIDS-defining illness or a CD4+ T-lymphocyte
count of <200 cells/µL.† Using the HIV/AIDS Reporting System (HARS),
case report data were collected by local and state health department
staff members and then transmitted to CDC devoid of patient names. The
findings in this report are based on HIV/AIDS diagnoses made during
2001--2006 and reported to CDC as of June 30, 2007 (1).
Numbers of diagnoses were adjusted for reporting delays and for
redistribution of cases with missing risk factor information, using a
standard method that has been described previously (2). This method
does not include statistical adjustments for diagnosed but unreported
cases or for cases yet to be diagnosed. To facilitate comparisons
between the estimated number of diagnoses occurring in 2001 and the
number occurring in 2006, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were
calculated. To examine trends, EAPCs with corresponding CIs were
calculated. EAPC measures the differences between adjacent years under
examination and then averages these inter-year differences. In this
report, transmission categories§ are discrete (e.g., "MSM" is distinct
from "MSM and IDU" and "IDU" is distinct from "MSM and IDU").
Accordingly, MSM who were also injection-drug users (MSM and IDU) were
excluded from analysis of MSM.
Of 214,379 HIV/AIDS diagnoses in 33 states during 2001--2006, a total
of 97,577 (46%) were among MSM. Decreases in diagnoses were observed in
all transmission categories except MSM (excluding MSM and IDU) (Figure
1). Among males, MSM accounted for 97,577 (63%) of cases. Men aged
25--44 years accounted for 64% of cases among MSM (Table). Among MSM,
the number of diagnoses increased from 16,081 (CI = 15,784--16,377) in
2001 to 17,465 (CI = 16,938--17,992) in 2006; (EAPC = 1.5) (Figure 1).
From 2001 to 2006, a 12.4% (EAPC = 1.9) increase in the number of
HIV/AIDS diagnoses among all black MSM was observed; however, an
increase of 93.1% (EAPC = 14.9) was observed among black MSM aged
13--24 years (Figure 2). During 2001--2006, approximately twice as many
(7,658) diagnoses occurred in black MSM aged 13--24 years as in their
white counterparts (3,221). The largest proportionate increase (255.6%
[EAPC = 30.8]) was among Asian/Pacific Islander MSM aged 13--24 years.
Among MSM aged 13--24 years, statistically significant increases in
diagnoses as measured by EAPC were observed in all racial/ethnic
populations except American Indian/Alaska Natives. Among MSM of all
ages, statistically significant increases as measured by EAPC were
observed in blacks, Hispanics, and Asian/Pacific Islanders.¶
Reported by: A Mitsch, MPH, X Hu, MS, K McDavid Harrison, PhD, T
Durant, PhD, Div of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS,
Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, CDC.
Editorial Note:
During 2001--2006, male-to-male sex remained the largest HIV
transmission category in the United States and the only one associated
with an increasing number of HIV/AIDS diagnoses. In this analysis,
statistically significant decreases in HIV/AIDS diagnoses were observed
for all other transmission categories (i.e., among persons likely to
have been infected through high-risk heterosexual contact, IDU, MSM and
IDU, and other routes). Among MSM aged 13--24 years, statistically
significant increases in diagnoses were observed in nearly all
racial/ethnic populations. These findings underscore the need for
continued effective testing and risk reduction interventions for MSM,
particularly those aged <25 years.
The data in this report indicate when persons were diagnosed with HIV
infection, rather than when they became infected. This is an important
distinction because a person might have been infected with HIV for
years before receiving a diagnosis of HIV infection. Determining when
persons who have been diagnosed were actually infected is difficult.
Although HIV diagnosis data can provide some indication of underlying
trends in HIV infection, this approach has limitations. A greater
number of tests for HIV infection among MSM might partially explain the
observed increase in HIV/AIDS diagnoses. However, available data
suggest that these increases cannot be explained by increases in
testing alone; the increase could be attributed to more targeted
testing, increasing incidence, or some combination of these.**
To improve the nation's ability to track new HIV infections, CDC has
established a new system for measuring incident HIV infections at the
population level. A novel laboratory method will be combined with
standard case surveillance procedures and statistical estimations to
provide a better means of estimating national HIV incidence from the
number of persons who are newly diagnosed with HIV (3). This system
will be able to distinguish between recent and long-standing HIV-1
infection on a population level. Estimates from the new system are
expected to be available in 2008. The new system will provide a better
tool for measuring progress in the prevention of HIV infection than
data based on HIV/AIDS diagnoses alone, such as those described in this
report. Nevertheless, diagnosis data will continue to play an important
role in monitoring the HIV epidemic, particularly among adolescents and
young adults who, because of their age, are unlikely to have been
infected many years before diagnosis. Additionally, HIV/AIDS diagnosis
data will continue to provide useful information for evaluating efforts
to increase HIV testing and will allow programs that do not conduct HIV
incidence surveillance to monitor the HIV epidemic in their local area.
The findings in this report are subject to at least four limitations.
First, the 33-state case surveillance data are not representative of
all HIV-positive persons in the United States. However, the
racial/ethnic disparities described in this report are similar to those
observed in AIDS cases from all 50 states (4). Second, since 1993, the
proportion of HIV/AIDS cases reported to CDC without an identified risk
factor for HIV infection has been increasing. In 2006, no risk factor
was reported for 25% of HIV (not AIDS) adult and adolescent cases
reported to CDC (4). This results in an increasing proportion of cases
that are assigned to transmission categories (including male-to-male
sexual contact) not based on interview with patients, but rather via
statistical adjustment. Risk factor information often is missing
because patients decline to disclose behaviors that might place them at
risk for HIV transmission or are unaware of their sex partners'
high-risk behavior. Third, methods for reporting delay adjustments have
greatest uncertainty for the most recent years' estimates of HIV/AIDS
diagnoses; therefore, recent trends should be interpreted with caution.
Finally, a backlog of cases diagnosed earlier than recorded in the data
might have exaggerated the number of diagnoses in the first 2--3 years
after name-based HIV (not AIDS) case reporting was implemented (5). For
example, retrospective ascertainment of name-based HIV case reports
might have resulted in a substantial number of cases that were recorded
as diagnosed during 2001--2002 but were actually diagnosed earlier. New
York's implementation of name-based HIV reporting in June 2000 might
have magnified the effect of this backlog on the 33-state trend
analysis because New York data represented 21% of all HIV/AIDS
diagnoses during 2001--2006. After exclusion of New York from this
analysis, however, an even larger statistically significant increase in
HIV/AIDS diagnoses among MSM was observed during 2001--2006 (EAPC = 3.1
[CI = 2.4--3.9]).
To reduce transmission of HIV among MSM of all races/ethnicities,
prevention strategies should be strengthened, improved, and implemented
more broadly. Testing is important in preventing HIV transmission
because it provides knowledge of one's infection status; after persons
become aware that they are HIV positive, most reduce their high-risk
sexual behavior (6). In addition, an estimated 25% of HIV-infected
persons have not received a diagnosis of HIV infection (7). These
persons represent a challenge in terms of HIV prevention and case
ascertainment. Moreover, testing is the first step to linking persons
infected with HIV to medical care. CDC recommends at least annual
testing for sexually active MSM and an "opt-out" approach for screening
of all patients aged 13--64 years in clinical settings ( .
Ulcerative and nonulcerative sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) such
as syphilis and gonorrhea facilitate HIV transmission from infected MSM
and acquisition of HIV by noninfected MSM; therefore, screening for
STDs in private and public clinical settings is an important component
of HIV prevention in MSM (9). STD and HIV prevention efforts should be
as fully integrated as possible. Furthermore, associations have been
observed between abuse of illicit and legal drugs such as
methamphetamine and alcohol, respectively, and high-risk behavior among
MSM. Screening for substance abuse in private and public clinical
settings is an important tool for reducing HIV transmission.††
Strengthened collaborations between STD, HIV, viral hepatitis, and
substance abuse programs should result in more effective HIV prevention
efforts.
CDC assists in the creation, development, and dissemination of
behavioral interventions for the MSM population. Recently, in
collaboration with the state health department and local organizations
in North Carolina, CDC implemented a successful intervention for young
black MSM (10). This intervention has resulted in decreases in
high-risk sexual behavior and the number of sex partners with whom such
behavior occurred. CDC recommends that state and local health
departments allocate HIV prevention resources to ensure that program
operations reflect the current state of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the
geographic areas for which each health department is responsible. In
support of CDC's strategic goal of reducing the number of new HIV
infections in the United States,§§ the proportion of MSM who adopt
behaviors that reduce risk for HIV transmission must increase.
References
1. CDC. HIV/AIDS Reporting System (HARS) user manual. Atlanta, GA:
US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2000.
2. Green TA. Using surveillance data to monitor trends in the AIDS
epidemic. Stat Med 1998;17:143--54.
3. Lee LM, McKenna MT. Monitoring the incidence of HIV infection in
the United States. Public Health Rep 2007;122(Suppl 1):72--9.
4. CDC. HIV/AIDS surveillance report, 2006. Vol. 18. Atlanta, GA: US
Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2008:12. Available at
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/reports.
5. Torian L, Bennani1 Y, Wethers J, Schwendemann J, Nash D. Use of
the serologic testing algorithm for recent HIV seroconversion to assess
specificity of routine surveillance to detection of incident vs
prevalent HIV: evaluation of the first 2 years of named HIV reporting,
New York City, June 1, 2000 to June 30, 2002. 11th Conference on
Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, 2004. Session 135 poster
abstract. Available at
http://www.retroconference.org/2004/cd/abstract/964.htm.
6. Marks G, Crepaz N, Senterfitt JW, Janssen RS. Meta-analysis of
high-risk sexual behavior in persons aware and unaware they are
infected with HIV in the United States: implications for HIV prevention
programs. J Aquir Immune Defic Syndr 2005;39:446--53.
7. Glynn M, Rhodes P. Estimated HIV prevalence in the United States
at the end of 2003 [Abstract T1-B1101]. Programs and abstracts of the
2005 National HIV Prevention Conference; June 12--15, 2005; Atlanta,
GA. Available at
http://www.aegis.com/conferences/nhivpc/2005/t1-b1101.html.
8. CDC. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults,
adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR
2006;55(No. RR-14).
9. Fleming DT, Wasserheit JN. From epidemiological synergy to public
health policy and practice: the contribution of other sexually
transmitted diseases to sexual transmission of HIV infection. Sex
Transm Infect 1999;75:3--17.
10. Jones KT, Gray P, Whiteside YO, et al. Evaluation of an HIV
prevention intervention adapted for black men who have sex with men. Am
J Public Health 2008;98:1043--50.
| Quote: |
Once again there has been a small victory for truth
and rights.
You spout more bullshit than CNN.
CNN deals with FACTS. If you want pure
bullsh*t, bigotry, drivel and lies, watch Faux News
with the rest of the bigoted losers of the RRR Cult.
What do *you* GET out of being a hateful bigot? What's IN
that for YOU? What do YOU stand to GAIN by being such an
ignorant loser?
Gee! You're getting pretty good at that speech. Taylor. Isn't
amazing what lecturing into mirrors can accomplish?
|
Answer the question.
| Quote: | --
Men have no right to put the well-being of the present generation |
wholly out of the question. Perhaps the only moral trust with any
certainty in our hands is the care of our own time. -Edmund Burke (1729
- 1797) |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
LeRoy Blue
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:09 pm Post subject: Re: Yet another Gay victory |
|
|
On 2008-08-24 08:09:09 -0400, "(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- Rx for RRR
Cult's Loathsome Agendas: Extinction!" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> said:
| Quote: | On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 05:52:57 GMT,
TAYLOR -- (aka "LeRoy Blue" <leroyblue@pillon.net> ...
Usenet LOSER and all-around Moron, spewed
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- Rx for the RRR Cult's Loathsome
Agendas: Extinction!" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> said:
"Death" <Death@yourdoor.net> wrote:
"RamRod Sword of Baal" <ramrod@truthonly.com> wrote:
Slowly but surely the Gay and Lesbian persons of this
world are gaining equality, despite the RR and and Bigot
Brigade's fighting tooth and nail.
http://www.365gay.com/news/081808-lesbian-ivf/
|
June 27, 2008 / 57(25);681-686
Trends in HIV/AIDS Diagnoses Among Men Who Have Sex with Men --- 33
States, 2001--2006
In 2008, CDC conducted an analysis of trends in diagnoses of human
immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS)
among men who have sex with men (MSM) in the 33 states* that have had
confidential, name-based HIV case reporting since at least 2001. This
report summarizes the results of that analysis, which indicated that
the number of HIV/AIDS diagnoses among MSM overall during 2001--2006
increased 8.6% (estimated annual percentage change [EAPC] = 1.5).
During 2001--2006, an estimated 214,379 persons had HIV/AIDS diagnosed
in the 33 states. Of these diagnoses, 46% were in MSM, and 4% were in
MSM who engaged in illicit injection-drug use (IDU) (i.e., MSM and
IDU). To reduce the impact of HIV/AIDS in the United States, HIV
prevention services that aim to reduce the risk for acquiring and
transmitting infection among MSM and link infected MSM to treatment
must be expanded.
In this report, HIV/AIDS refers to three categories of diagnoses
collectively: 1) a diagnosis of HIV infection (not AIDS), 2) a
diagnosis of HIV infection with subsequent AIDS diagnosis, and 3)
concurrent diagnoses of HIV infection and AIDS. Reporting cases of HIV
infection (not AIDS) and AIDS is now legally mandated in all U.S.
states, the District of Columbia, and five U.S. territories. The CDC
case definition for HIV infection (not AIDS) requires a positive test
result from an assay approved by the Food and Drug Administration that
demonstrates evidence of HIV infection; the case definition for AIDS
requires meeting the HIV infection (not AIDS) case definition, plus
diagnosis of at least one AIDS-defining illness or a CD4+ T-lymphocyte
count of <200 cells/µL.† Using the HIV/AIDS Reporting System (HARS),
case report data were collected by local and state health department
staff members and then transmitted to CDC devoid of patient names. The
findings in this report are based on HIV/AIDS diagnoses made during
2001--2006 and reported to CDC as of June 30, 2007 (1).
Numbers of diagnoses were adjusted for reporting delays and for
redistribution of cases with missing risk factor information, using a
standard method that has been described previously (2). This method
does not include statistical adjustments for diagnosed but unreported
cases or for cases yet to be diagnosed. To facilitate comparisons
between the estimated number of diagnoses occurring in 2001 and the
number occurring in 2006, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were
calculated. To examine trends, EAPCs with corresponding CIs were
calculated. EAPC measures the differences between adjacent years under
examination and then averages these inter-year differences. In this
report, transmission categories§ are discrete (e.g., "MSM" is distinct
from "MSM and IDU" and "IDU" is distinct from "MSM and IDU").
Accordingly, MSM who were also injection-drug users (MSM and IDU) were
excluded from analysis of MSM.
Of 214,379 HIV/AIDS diagnoses in 33 states during 2001--2006, a total
of 97,577 (46%) were among MSM. Decreases in diagnoses were observed in
all transmission categories except MSM (excluding MSM and IDU) (Figure
1). Among males, MSM accounted for 97,577 (63%) of cases. Men aged
25--44 years accounted for 64% of cases among MSM (Table). Among MSM,
the number of diagnoses increased from 16,081 (CI = 15,784--16,377) in
2001 to 17,465 (CI = 16,938--17,992) in 2006; (EAPC = 1.5) (Figure 1).
From 2001 to 2006, a 12.4% (EAPC = 1.9) increase in the number of
HIV/AIDS diagnoses among all black MSM was observed; however, an
increase of 93.1% (EAPC = 14.9) was observed among black MSM aged
13--24 years (Figure 2). During 2001--2006, approximately twice as many
(7,658) diagnoses occurred in black MSM aged 13--24 years as in their
white counterparts (3,221). The largest proportionate increase (255.6%
[EAPC = 30.8]) was among Asian/Pacific Islander MSM aged 13--24 years.
Among MSM aged 13--24 years, statistically significant increases in
diagnoses as measured by EAPC were observed in all racial/ethnic
populations except American Indian/Alaska Natives. Among MSM of all
ages, statistically significant increases as measured by EAPC were
observed in blacks, Hispanics, and Asian/Pacific Islanders.¶
Reported by: A Mitsch, MPH, X Hu, MS, K McDavid Harrison, PhD, T
Durant, PhD, Div of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS,
Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, CDC.
Editorial Note:
During 2001--2006, male-to-male sex remained the largest HIV
transmission category in the United States and the only one associated
with an increasing number of HIV/AIDS diagnoses. In this analysis,
statistically significant decreases in HIV/AIDS diagnoses were observed
for all other transmission categories (i.e., among persons likely to
have been infected through high-risk heterosexual contact, IDU, MSM and
IDU, and other routes). Among MSM aged 13--24 years, statistically
significant increases in diagnoses were observed in nearly all
racial/ethnic populations. These findings underscore the need for
continued effective testing and risk reduction interventions for MSM,
particularly those aged <25 years.
The data in this report indicate when persons were diagnosed with HIV
infection, rather than when they became infected. This is an important
distinction because a person might have been infected with HIV for
years before receiving a diagnosis of HIV infection. Determining when
persons who have been diagnosed were actually infected is difficult.
Although HIV diagnosis data can provide some indication of underlying
trends in HIV infection, this approach has limitations. A greater
number of tests for HIV infection among MSM might partially explain the
observed increase in HIV/AIDS diagnoses. However, available data
suggest that these increases cannot be explained by increases in
testing alone; the increase could be attributed to more targeted
testing, increasing incidence, or some combination of these.**
To improve the nation's ability to track new HIV infections, CDC has
established a new system for measuring incident HIV infections at the
population level. A novel laboratory method will be combined with
standard case surveillance procedures and statistical estimations to
provide a better means of estimating national HIV incidence from the
number of persons who are newly diagnosed with HIV (3). This system
will be able to distinguish between recent and long-standing HIV-1
infection on a population level. Estimates from the new system are
expected to be available in 2008. The new system will provide a better
tool for measuring progress in the prevention of HIV infection than
data based on HIV/AIDS diagnoses alone, such as those described in this
report. Nevertheless, diagnosis data will continue to play an important
role in monitoring the HIV epidemic, particularly among adolescents and
young adults who, because of their age, are unlikely to have been
infected many years before diagnosis. Additionally, HIV/AIDS diagnosis
data will continue to provide useful information for evaluating efforts
to increase HIV testing and will allow programs that do not conduct HIV
incidence surveillance to monitor the HIV epidemic in their local area.
The findings in this report are subject to at least four limitations.
First, the 33-state case surveillance data are not representative of
all HIV-positive persons in the United States. However, the
racial/ethnic disparities described in this report are similar to those
observed in AIDS cases from all 50 states (4). Second, since 1993, the
proportion of HIV/AIDS cases reported to CDC without an identified risk
factor for HIV infection has been increasing. In 2006, no risk factor
was reported for 25% of HIV (not AIDS) adult and adolescent cases
reported to CDC (4). This results in an increasing proportion of cases
that are assigned to transmission categories (including male-to-male
sexual contact) not based on interview with patients, but rather via
statistical adjustment. Risk factor information often is missing
because patients decline to disclose behaviors that might place them at
risk for HIV transmission or are unaware of their sex partners'
high-risk behavior. Third, methods for reporting delay adjustments have
greatest uncertainty for the most recent years' estimates of HIV/AIDS
diagnoses; therefore, recent trends should be interpreted with caution.
Finally, a backlog of cases diagnosed earlier than recorded in the data
might have exaggerated the number of diagnoses in the first 2--3 years
after name-based HIV (not AIDS) case reporting was implemented (5). For
example, retrospective ascertainment of name-based HIV case reports
might have resulted in a substantial number of cases that were recorded
as diagnosed during 2001--2002 but were actually diagnosed earlier. New
York's implementation of name-based HIV reporting in June 2000 might
have magnified the effect of this backlog on the 33-state trend
analysis because New York data represented 21% of all HIV/AIDS
diagnoses during 2001--2006. After exclusion of New York from this
analysis, however, an even larger statistically significant increase in
HIV/AIDS diagnoses among MSM was observed during 2001--2006 (EAPC = 3.1
[CI = 2.4--3.9]).
To reduce transmission of HIV among MSM of all races/ethnicities,
prevention strategies should be strengthened, improved, and implemented
more broadly. Testing is important in preventing HIV transmission
because it provides knowledge of one's infection status; after persons
become aware that they are HIV positive, most reduce their high-risk
sexual behavior (6). In addition, an estimated 25% of HIV-infected
persons have not received a diagnosis of HIV infection (7). These
persons represent a challenge in terms of HIV prevention and case
ascertainment. Moreover, testing is the first step to linking persons
infected with HIV to medical care. CDC recommends at least annual
testing for sexually active MSM and an "opt-out" approach for screening
of all patients aged 13--64 years in clinical settings (.
Ulcerative and nonulcerative sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) such
as syphilis and gonorrhea facilitate HIV transmission from infected MSM
and acquisition of HIV by noninfected MSM; therefore, screening for
STDs in private and public clinical settings is an important component
of HIV prevention in MSM (9). STD and HIV prevention efforts should be
as fully integrated as possible. Furthermore, associations have been
observed between abuse of illicit and legal drugs such as
methamphetamine and alcohol, respectively, and high-risk behavior among
MSM. Screening for substance abuse in private and public clinical
settings is an important tool for reducing HIV transmission.††
Strengthened collaborations between STD, HIV, viral hepatitis, and
substance abuse programs should result in more effective HIV prevention
efforts.
CDC assists in the creation, development, and dissemination of
behavioral interventions for the MSM population. Recently, in
collaboration with the state health department and local organizations
in North Carolina, CDC implemented a successful intervention for young
black MSM (10). This intervention has resulted in decreases in
high-risk sexual behavior and the number of sex partners with whom such
behavior occurred. CDC recommends that state and local health
departments allocate HIV prevention resources to ensure that program
operations reflect the current state of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the
geographic areas for which each health department is responsible. In
support of CDC's strategic goal of reducing the number of new HIV
infections in the United States,§§ the proportion of MSM who adopt
behaviors that reduce risk for HIV transmission must increase.
References
1. CDC. HIV/AIDS Reporting System (HARS) user manual. Atlanta, GA:
US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2000.
2. Green TA. Using surveillance data to monitor trends in the AIDS
epidemic. Stat Med 1998;17:143--54.
3. Lee LM, McKenna MT. Monitoring the incidence of HIV infection in
the United States. Public Health Rep 2007;122(Suppl 1):72--9.
4. CDC. HIV/AIDS surveillance report, 2006. Vol. 18. Atlanta, GA: US
Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2008:12. Available at
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/reports.
5. Torian L, Bennani1 Y, Wethers J, Schwendemann J, Nash D. Use of
the serologic testing algorithm for recent HIV seroconversion to assess
specificity of routine surveillance to detection of incident vs
prevalent HIV: evaluation of the first 2 years of named HIV reporting,
New York City, June 1, 2000 to June 30, 2002. 11th Conference on
Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, 2004. Session 135 poster
abstract. Available at
http://www.retroconference.org/2004/cd/abstract/964.htm.
6. Marks G, Crepaz N, Senterfitt JW, Janssen RS. Meta-analysis of
high-risk sexual behavior in persons aware and unaware they are
infected with HIV in the United States: implications for HIV prevention
programs. J Aquir Immune Defic Syndr 2005;39:446--53.
7. Glynn M, Rhodes P. Estimated HIV prevalence in the United States
at the end of 2003 [Abstract T1-B1101]. Programs and abstracts of the
2005 National HIV Prevention Conference; June 12--15, 2005; Atlanta,
GA. Available at
http://www.aegis.com/conferences/nhivpc/2005/t1-b1101.html.
8. CDC. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults,
adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR
2006;55(No. RR-14).
9. Fleming DT, Wasserheit JN. From epidemiological synergy to public
health policy and practice: the contribution of other sexually
transmitted diseases to sexual transmission of HIV infection. Sex
Transm Infect 1999;75:3--17.
10. Jones KT, Gray P, Whiteside YO, et al. Evaluation of an HIV
prevention intervention adapted for black men who have sex with men. Am
J Public Health 2008;98:1043--50.
| Quote: |
Once again there has been a small victory for truth
and rights.
You spout more bullshit than CNN.
CNN deals with FACTS. If you want pure
bullsh*t, bigotry, drivel and lies, watch Faux News
with the rest of the bigoted losers of the RRR Cult.
What do *you* GET out of being a hateful bigot? What's IN
that for YOU? What do YOU stand to GAIN by being such an
ignorant loser?
Gee! You're getting pretty good at that speech. Taylor. Isn't
amazing what lecturing into mirrors can accomplish?
|
Answer the question.
| Quote: | --
Men have no right to put the well-being of the present generation |
wholly out of the question. Perhaps the only moral trust with any
certainty in our hands is the care of our own time. -Edmund Burke (1729
- 1797) |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
(`.Craig Chilton.
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:00 pm Post subject: Re: Yet another Gay victory |
|
|
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:09:04 GMT,
TAYLOR -- (aka "LeRoy Blue") <leroyblue@pillon.net> ...
Usenet LOSER and all-around Moronic Bigot...
... isn't worth wasting time on.
-- Craig Chilton
xanadu222@mchsi.com -- To E-Mail me.
http://www.roadrat.com -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL.
http://apifar.blogspot.com -- Great TACTICS to Fight Bigotry.
http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Christianity *vs.* Bigotry. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
(`.Craig Chilton.
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:00 pm Post subject: Re: Yet another Gay victory |
|
|
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:09:04 GMT,
TAYLOR -- (aka "LeRoy Blue") <leroyblue@pillon.net> ...
Usenet LOSER and all-around Moronic Bigot...
... isn't worth wasting time on.
-- Craig Chilton
xanadu222@mchsi.com -- To E-Mail me.
http://www.roadrat.com -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL.
http://apifar.blogspot.com -- Great TACTICS to Fight Bigotry.
http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Christianity *vs.* Bigotry. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Death
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:17 pm Post subject: Re: Yet another Got aids yet victory |
|
|
| Quote: | "Death" <Death@yourdoor.net> wrote:
You spout more bullshit than CNN.
As I was saying....
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/08/24/state/n113044D37.DTL |
It is hilarious to see a faggot consider the San fag-sisco gate a bigoted
site.
So, here you go
http://www.365gay.com/
Now let the tears flow, lol. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Death
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:17 pm Post subject: Re: Yet another Got aids yet victory |
|
|
| Quote: | "Death" <Death@yourdoor.net> wrote:
You spout more bullshit than CNN.
As I was saying....
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/08/24/state/n113044D37.DTL |
It is hilarious to see a faggot consider the San fag-sisco gate a bigoted
site.
So, here you go
http://www.365gay.com/
Now let the tears flow, lol. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
(`.Craig Chilton.
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:17 pm Post subject: Re: Yet another Gay victory |
|
|
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:51:24 -0500,
"Death" <Death@yourdoor.net> wrote:
| Quote: | "(`.Craig Chilton.) -- Rx for RRR Cult's Loathsome
Agendas: Extinction!" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Death" <Death@yourdoor.net> wrote:
"RamRod Sword of Baal" <ramrod@truthonly.com> wrote:
|
| Quote: | Slowly but surely the Gay and Lesbian persons of this
world are gaining equality, despite the RR and and Bigot
Brigade's fighting tooth and nail.
|
http://www.365gay.com/news/081808-lesbian-ivf/
| Quote: | Once again there has been a small victory for truth
and rights.
You spout more bullshit than CNN.
CNN deals with FACTS. If you want pure
bullsh*t, bigotry, drivel and lies, watch Faux News
with the rest of the bigoted losers of the RRR Cult.
As I was saying....
|
<bigotry-flush>
Here's a far BETTER site:
http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/07/25/ca-unions-oppose-prop-8/
-- Craig Chilton
xanadu222@mchsi.com -- To E-Mail me.
http://www.roadrat.com -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL.
http://apifar.blogspot.com -- Great TACTICS to Fight Bigotry.
http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Christianity *vs.* Bigotry.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Their Inability to Answer THESE Two Questions
with FACTS Indicts the RRR Cult, and PROVES
it to be a Crowd of Ignorant & Hateful Bigots.
The questions that NO one who opposes fully-legal same-sex
marriage, has EVER, to the best of my knowledge, been able to
answer factually:
"If a same-sex couple that's been cohabitating in a
community for 20 years gets the right to become
legally married to one another, and then ties the knot,
HOW could that possibly be detrimental in ANY way
to the marriage of any opposite-sex couple in that
community?
And...
"Congress, and several states have passed so-called
"Defense of Marriage Acts" (DOMA). Just WHAT suppos-
edly-detrimental factor could possibly affect opposite-
sex couples' marriages negatively, which could thus
justify so draconian a law? What do such laws "defend"
opposite-sex marriage AGAINST? What is the THREAT?"
Hey!! RRR Cultists! Inquiring SENSIBLE minds want to know.
And as MarkSebree said on Aug. 7, 2008 --
Same sex marriage does not harm anyone, and does not
infringe on the rights of heterosexuals, and it does not confer
onto homosexuals any rights that heterosexuals do not already
have. Therefore, there is no valid argument against homosexuals
having the same right to marry the consenting single adult of their
choice in the same manner and for the same reasons as hetero-
sexuals currently enjoy, and having that marriage recognized as
legally valid and binding just as widely the marriage between a
heterosexual couple.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
(`.Craig Chilton.
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:17 pm Post subject: Re: Yet another Gay victory |
|
|
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:51:24 -0500,
"Death" <Death@yourdoor.net> wrote:
| Quote: | "(`.Craig Chilton.) -- Rx for RRR Cult's Loathsome
Agendas: Extinction!" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Death" <Death@yourdoor.net> wrote:
"RamRod Sword of Baal" <ramrod@truthonly.com> wrote:
|
| Quote: | Slowly but surely the Gay and Lesbian persons of this
world are gaining equality, despite the RR and and Bigot
Brigade's fighting tooth and nail.
|
http://www.365gay.com/news/081808-lesbian-ivf/
| Quote: | Once again there has been a small victory for truth
and rights.
You spout more bullshit than CNN.
CNN deals with FACTS. If you want pure
bullsh*t, bigotry, drivel and lies, watch Faux News
with the rest of the bigoted losers of the RRR Cult.
As I was saying....
|
<bigotry-flush>
Here's a far BETTER site:
http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/07/25/ca-unions-oppose-prop-8/
-- Craig Chilton
xanadu222@mchsi.com -- To E-Mail me.
http://www.roadrat.com -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL.
http://apifar.blogspot.com -- Great TACTICS to Fight Bigotry.
http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Christianity *vs.* Bigotry.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Their Inability to Answer THESE Two Questions
with FACTS Indicts the RRR Cult, and PROVES
it to be a Crowd of Ignorant & Hateful Bigots.
The questions that NO one who opposes fully-legal same-sex
marriage, has EVER, to the best of my knowledge, been able to
answer factually:
"If a same-sex couple that's been cohabitating in a
community for 20 years gets the right to become
legally married to one another, and then ties the knot,
HOW could that possibly be detrimental in ANY way
to the marriage of any opposite-sex couple in that
community?
And...
"Congress, and several states have passed so-called
"Defense of Marriage Acts" (DOMA). Just WHAT suppos-
edly-detrimental factor could possibly affect opposite-
sex couples' marriages negatively, which could thus
justify so draconian a law? What do such laws "defend"
opposite-sex marriage AGAINST? What is the THREAT?"
Hey!! RRR Cultists! Inquiring SENSIBLE minds want to know.
And as MarkSebree said on Aug. 7, 2008 --
Same sex marriage does not harm anyone, and does not
infringe on the rights of heterosexuals, and it does not confer
onto homosexuals any rights that heterosexuals do not already
have. Therefore, there is no valid argument against homosexuals
having the same right to marry the consenting single adult of their
choice in the same manner and for the same reasons as hetero-
sexuals currently enjoy, and having that marriage recognized as
legally valid and binding just as widely the marriage between a
heterosexual couple.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Death
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:17 pm Post subject: Re: Yet another Gay victory |
|
|
"(`.Craig Chilton.) -- Rx for RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas:
Extinction!"
| Quote: | "Death" <Death@yourdoor.net> wrote:
"RamRod Sword of Baal" <ramrod@truthonly.com> wrote:
Slowly but surely the Gay and Lesbian persons of this
world are gaining equality, despite the RR and and Bigot
Brigade's fighting tooth and nail.
http://www.365gay.com/news/081808-lesbian-ivf/
Once again there has been a small victory for truth
and rights.
You spout more bullshit than CNN.
CNN deals with FACTS. If you want pure
bullsh*t, bigotry, drivel and lies, watch Faux News
with the rest of the bigoted losers of the RRR Cult.
As I was saying.......... |
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/08/24/state/n113044D37.DTL |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Death
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:17 pm Post subject: Re: Yet another Gay victory |
|
|
"(`.Craig Chilton.) -- Rx for RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas:
Extinction!"
| Quote: | "Death" <Death@yourdoor.net> wrote:
"RamRod Sword of Baal" <ramrod@truthonly.com> wrote:
Slowly but surely the Gay and Lesbian persons of this
world are gaining equality, despite the RR and and Bigot
Brigade's fighting tooth and nail.
http://www.365gay.com/news/081808-lesbian-ivf/
Once again there has been a small victory for truth
and rights.
You spout more bullshit than CNN.
CNN deals with FACTS. If you want pure
bullsh*t, bigotry, drivel and lies, watch Faux News
with the rest of the bigoted losers of the RRR Cult.
As I was saying.......... |
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/08/24/state/n113044D37.DTL |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
RamRod Sword of Baal
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 3:49 am Post subject: Re: Yet another Gay victory |
|
|
"LeRoy Blue" <leroyblue@pillon.net> wrote in message
news:2008082401395550073-leroyblue@pillonnet...
| Quote: | On 2008-08-18 21:33:53 -0400, "RamRod Sword of Baal"
ramrod@truthonly.com> said:
Slowly but surely the Gay and Lesbian persons of this world are gaining
equality, despite the RR and and Bigot Brigade's fighting tooth and nail.
Once again there has been a small victory for truth and rights.
http://www.365gay.com/news/081808-lesbian-ivf/
My, my, you must have stopped reading before you got to this:
http://www.365gay.com/news/lesbian-moms-lawsuit/
By 365gay Newscenter Staff
07.24.2008 7:01pm EDT
(Canberra) An Australian court ruled Thursday that a lesbian couple who
had twins instead of a single child cannot sue the doctor who performed in
vitro fertilization on one of the women.
|
Some cut
No I have read it and am in complete agreement with the Judges decision. I
consider it a frivolous case, something we see so much of in the USA, and
has been slowly creeping in here in Australia. A few losses with very
healthy costs being awarded against persons who start frivolous case will
help to stop them.
It has IMHO nothing to do with Gay equality, but rather a couple of money
grabbers suing a Doctor. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
