| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
RichTravsky
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:18 pm Post subject: Re: Coward miomyo STILL runing away Re: Guilty as Charged!!! |
 |
|
RichTravsky wrote:
| Quote: | MioMyo wrote:
"RichTravsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
MioMyo wrote:
"Mitchell Holman" <Noemail@comcast.com> wrote in message
"MioMyo" <USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in
"blue_collar_worker" <godert@hotmail.com> wrote in message
stubblef@gmail.com> wrote in message
Guilty as Charged!!!! Palins found to have abused her Authority!!!!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27105917/?GT1-43001
Well folks... there you have it!!! If the charges fit you must not
aquit!!!!
You are lieing. Palin was neveer charged with anything. It was an
investigation.
Furthermore, this Trooper-gate nonsense has already been shown to be
nothing more than a partisan witch hunt.
A Republican-dominated committee appointed by a
Republican-dominated legislature to investigate a
Republican governor is "partisan"?
Your Proof of this charge is Nothing as usual......
Where's YOUR proof otherwise?
The investigation was authorized in late July.
http://www.ktva.com/ci_10026165?
07/28/2008
Lawmakers will hire someone within a week to investigate whether Governor
Sarah Palin abused her power in firing Public Safety Commissioner Walt
Monegan. The legislative council approved 100,000 dollars for the
investigation that will find out whether Palin was angry at Monegan for
not
firing an Alaska State Trooper who went through a messy divorce with
Palin's
sister.
On Monday afternoon, the Joint Legislative Council, filled with
Republicans
and Democrats, voted 12 to 0 to formally call for an investigation against
Governor Palin in a manner-that they are stressing-will be unbiased and
done
in a timely fashion.
...
The JLC is overwhelming republicon:
http://www.cleveland.com/election/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/isele/122373540724830.xml&coll=2
Saturday, October 11, 2008
...
The 14-member panel is made up of 10 Republicans and four Democrats. Two
of
the Republicans were absent for Friday's vote to release the report.
Palin was convicted of WHAT?
Changing the subject? You claimed without proof
Furthermore, this Trooper-gate nonsense has already been shown to be
nothing more than a partisan witch hunt.
|
STILL no answer.
| Quote: | Mitchell replied
A Republican-dominated committee appointed by a
Republican-dominated legislature to investigate a
Republican governor is "partisan"?
to which you finally replied
Your Proof of this charge is Nothing as usual......
My post showed the investigation was not partisan.
Plus, tell me again she didn't have the right to fire the commissioner since
no one has said she didn't. Instead your entire point is what her motivation
was, as if you really know!
It was *how* she went about it. Big difference. |
|
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Phil
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:25 pm Post subject: Re: Joe the Plumber was a hoax |
|
|
<* US *> wrote in message
news:v9v5i4tldq1tnk665arpdai5of0jm8ipfc@4ax.com...
| Quote: | On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:16:49 -0600, "Phil" <faas@mindspring.com
wrote:
... calling DB stupid, apparently due to the government's
actions of adding false arrearages.
Are you claiming that DB didn't father the children?
He had already admitted otherwise.
Can't you read?
|
I'm not claiming anything of the sort, I am claiming that the
government's demand that he supply the mother of his children with money
is not supporting children.
Do you think that by paying mothers, fathers are fulfilling their role
as parents?
Phil #3 |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Phil
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:29 pm Post subject: Re: Joe the Plumber was a hoax |
|
|
<* US *> wrote in message
news:p5v5i41cgmamg1ig9pgig1ac7ecopq0qck@4ax.com...
| Quote: | On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:53:29 -0800, "Chris" <reddd@juno.com> wrote:
...stupid?
If you can't manage to figure out how and when
to use birth control, you're not bright.
|
I suppose this would include the millions of women who must have other
options to prevent becoming parents including
'abortion-as-birth-control', "baby drop-offs" and demanding the
government or the next man provide what she can't or won't?
| Quote: |
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 18:11:04 -0800, "DB" <DeeBee@netscape.net> wrote:
...my arrearages ...
Too bad you're too stupid to learn how to use a condom.
|
Contraception has nothing to do with child support, false arrearages
from books cooked by socialists.
And *you're* calling others "stupid"?
Phil #3 |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Phil
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:39 pm Post subject: Re: Joe the Plumber was a hoax |
|
|
<* US *> wrote in message
news:47v5i4l9np3qp4761f67q6j97kiri7di16@4ax.com...
| Quote: | On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:26:06 -0600, "Phil" <faas@mindspring.com
wrote:
* US *> wrote in message
news:qcmgh49gu07sne21690oecvup90gqp596j@4ax.com...
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 18:11:04 -0800, "DB" <DeeBee@netscape.net> wrote:
...my arrearages ...
Too bad you're too stupid to learn how to use a condom.
Even that won't help you when the government decides to force men to
You believe that the government forces men to avoid using birth
control?
|
Your ignorance is showing. Hundreds of men have been proclaimed "father"
that are biologically unrelated to the children in question.
The link provided in the post you quote (which link you apparently
didn't read and cut from your reply) shows an example of a man who was
charged by the department of human services for paternity and even
though the final result was that DNA showed this guy to NOT be the
father along with the mother telling them all along that this was the
wrong man, they continued to demand payment of child support. The
"father" never even met the mother so tell me how a condom would have
protected this man. I'm all ears.
| Quote: |
Paternity, and/or the avoidance thereof, is a man's responsibility.
|
So women are too immature and childish to know or be expected to prevent
pregnancy?
| Quote: |
That remains no matter what unlikely discrepancies may occur on rare
occasion.
|
How did that apply in the link provided?
It sounds like you saying that any man paying is fine as long as some
man, any man pays for a woman's decision to have a baby.
Phil #3 |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Phil
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:44 pm Post subject: Re: Joe the Plumber was a hoax |
|
|
<* US *> wrote in message
news:s478i4tl3tr9m13bbunbibeul27gifg1fj@4ax.com...
| Quote: | On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:29:29 -0800, "Chris" <reddd@juno.com> wrote:
Sounds
Those voices in your head are lying to you.
Men are responsible for paternity. If they
want it, they can have it. If they don't want
it, it's on them to prevent it.
|
A lie. No man becomes a father without the express permission of the
mother of the child. Neither does he have the same choices the mother
has in preventing birth or other options that come into play after
birth.
| Quote: |
... I'd sure like to know ...
You'd have to start using your brain.
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:26:06 -0600, "Phil" <faas@mindspring.com
wrote:
* US *> wrote in message
news:qcmgh49gu07sne21690oecvup90gqp596j@4ax.com...
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 18:11:04 -0800, "DB" <DeeBee@netscape.net> wrote:
...my arrearages ...
Too bad you're too stupid to learn how to use a condom.
Even that won't help you when the government decides to force men to
You believe that the government forces men to avoid using birth
control?
Paternity, and/or the avoidance thereof, is a man's responsibility.
That remains no matter what unlikely discrepancies may occur on rare
occasion.
|
Not at all. Men have only one option in paternity and that is to engage
in sex. Women have several others including the one to engage or not
engage in sex. Childbirth is the option of women and ONLY women. Men can
be cooperative but cannot make any decisions.
Phil #3 |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Phil
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:49 pm Post subject: Re: Joe the Plumber was a hoax |
|
|
<* US *> wrote in message
news:ucv5i4plg2eh5rgm22atk19bt6vapan6sj@4ax.com...
| Quote: | On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:26:57 -0600, "Phil" <faas@mindspring.com
wrote:
Here's one way such things happen:
Actually, your 'example' has nothing to do with the thread.
Learn to read.
|
Denial. Cool.
Phil #3 |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Chris
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:52 pm Post subject: Re: Joe the Plumber was a hoax |
|
|
"* US *" wrote in message news:p5v5i41cgmamg1ig9pgig1ac7ecopq0qck@4ax.com...
| Quote: | On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:53:29 -0800, "Chris" <reddd@juno.com> wrote:
...stupid?
If you can't manage to figure out how and when
to use birth control, you're not bright.
|
Keyword: "if". Thank you for your opinion just the same. Did you have a
point?
| Quote: |
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 18:11:04 -0800, "DB" <DeeBee@netscape.net> wrote:
...my arrearages ...
Too bad you're too stupid to learn how to use a condom.
|
The above statement is akin to me saying to you "too bad you're too stupid
to learn how to type on a keyboard". |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Chris
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:22 pm Post subject: Re: Joe the Plumber was a hoax |
|
|
"* US *" wrote in message news:s478i4tl3tr9m13bbunbibeul27gifg1fj@4ax.com...
| Quote: | On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:29:29 -0800, "Chris" <reddd@juno.com> wrote:
Sounds
Those voices in your head are lying to you.
|
Your editing of my quotes coupled with your replies to such edited quotes is
amusing to say the least. Perhaps you might give alt.comedy a try. :)
| Quote: |
Men are responsible for paternity. If they
want it, they can have it. If they don't want
it, it's on them to prevent it.
|
Translation: If men want paternity, they can FORCE a woman into pregnancy
and birth. If they do not want it, they can FORCE a woman to have an
abortion. Just curious, have you shared your position in the feminist
groups?
| Quote: |
... I'd sure like to know ...
You'd have to start using your brain.
|
(see above)
| Quote: |
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:26:06 -0600, "Phil" <faas@mindspring.com> wrote:
* US *> wrote in message
news:qcmgh49gu07sne21690oecvup90gqp596j@4ax.com...
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 18:11:04 -0800, "DB" <DeeBee@netscape.net> wrote:
...my arrearages ...
Too bad you're too stupid to learn how to use a condom.
Even that won't help you when the government decides to force men to
You believe that the government forces men to avoid using birth control?
Paternity, and/or the avoidance thereof, is a man's responsibility.
That remains no matter what unlikely discrepancies may occur on rare
occasion.
|
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Chris
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:22 pm Post subject: Re: Joe the Plumber was a hoax |
|
|
"Phil" <faas@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:Sb2dnfl0ftt8o7nUnZ2dnUVZ_t7inZ2d@earthlink.com...
| Quote: |
* US *> wrote in message
news:p5v5i41cgmamg1ig9pgig1ac7ecopq0qck@4ax.com...
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:53:29 -0800, "Chris" <reddd@juno.com> wrote:
...stupid?
If you can't manage to figure out how and when
to use birth control, you're not bright.
I suppose this would include the millions of women who must have other
options to prevent becoming parents including 'abortion-as-birth-control',
"baby drop-offs" and demanding the government or the next man provide what
she can't or won't?
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 18:11:04 -0800, "DB" <DeeBee@netscape.net> wrote:
...my arrearages ...
Too bad you're too stupid to learn how to use a condom.
Contraception has nothing to do with child support, false arrearages from
books cooked by socialists.
And *you're* calling others "stupid"?
|
It cracks me up how these ignorant posters invariably end up introducing
condoms into the discussion. For some strange reason, they proclaim that the
use of condoms insure that a man will not get ripped off by the "child
support" people. Amazing!
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Patriot Games
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:00 am Post subject: Re: Kansas Preacher Pushes Obama Muslim Message. |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 07:56:29 -0800 (PST), "Tom Sr."
<tomswiftsenior@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | On Nov 18, 2:10 pm, Clay <clays0nl...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 18, 2:07 pm, Bill Steele wrote:
Doesn't anyone know that "Allah" simply means "God?"
Some choose to remain willfully-ignorant of this fact.
Here is, sadly, one somewhat typical thread where you can find Patriot
Games (a.k.a. Bob Milby Jr. of Florida) and Harold Burton claiming
that "Allah is Satan".
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/browse_thread/thread/42ab95f158070ed1/f528466433751d79?hl=en&q=allah+satan+arabic+%22patriot+games%22+%22tom+sr.%22&lnk=ol&
Subject: "Allah" is the Arabic word for "God"
That's a great point. It's why I found and posted the
clown's name & URL.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/b9b8df09b7b47c11?hl=en
On Mar 13 2007, 11:34 am, "Tom Sr." <tomswif...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mar 13, 9:47 am, "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bast...@Yahoo.com> wrote:
Wrong.
God is God.
Allah is Satan.
--
BZZZ! Why the fuck did you bother playing, you
racist Republican idiot?
The Arabic word for "God" is "Allah".
The Arabic word for "Satan" is "Shaitan".
NOT. THE. SAME. THING.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/f432eac5117246ba?hl=en
On Mar 13 2007, 1:14 pm, "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bast...@Yahoo.com
wrote:
"Tom Sr." <tomswif...@gmail.com> wrote...
On Mar 5, 10:14 pm, "American Jesus" <z...@netscape.net> wrote:
Just a reminder to rightwingers who think that the Christian god and
the Muslim god are two different things. They aren't. You worship
the same god as Muslims, and that's a fact. Choke on it.
--
I think it shows the sheer depth of stupidity and the ultimate
hypocrisy of religious fundamentalists, both Muslim and Christian,
when both *claim* that God/Allah is on "OUR SIDE" in a war.
If there is a Hell, I think they will all burn in it.
--
Shut your cock-hole you Atheist piece of shit Nigger.
There is a Hell and you will spend eternity there with the Devil's cock
buried in your ass - along with the rest of your Athiest homo-pals and
Muslim friends.
Ah, Milby Jr., that was a year and a half and even now you still
refuse to understand "Allah" means "God" in Arabic -- and you are also
still blatantly obsessive with male homosexual sex.
|
It bears repeating:
Shut your cock-hole you Atheist piece of shit Nigger.
There is a Hell and you will spend eternity there with the Devil's
cock buried in your ass - along with the rest of your Athiest
homo-pals and Muslim friends.
Bwahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!
1) Allah is Satan.
2) Satan found an unemployed drunk pedophile sitting in the desert
with his balls in the dirt masturbating. His name was Mohammad. Satan
persuaded him to start a new cult called Islam.
3) Islam is an evil-inspired destructive cult.
4) Muslims are servants of the Devil.
5) I wipe my ass with pages torn from your Quran. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
(¯`·.¸ Craig Chilt•n ¸.
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:26 am Post subject: "Holick obtained his theological degree from the Seminary of |
|
|
"Holick obtained his theological degree from
the Seminary of the Divine Dipshits."
SOURCE: http://writechic.wordpress.com/
Signs of the Ignoramus Times
There's got to be a reason that MENTAL is smack in the middle of
fundamentalist. Annoying extremist Christians remind America of just
how much our educational system sucks. CNN's Rick Sanchez reports
on a church marquee that reads “America we have a Muslim president.
This is a sin against the Lord.” Pastor Mark Holick of [Wichita], Kansas
tells those who explain slowly in small words that Obama is a Christian:
"That's not the point. The point is he's not a Christian.”
Of course, since Obama IS a Christian, and NOT a Muslim, that
makes Mark Holick a LIAR. And since the Bible frowns on lying, that
ALSO makes Mark Holick a HYPOCRITE.
Talk about how RRR Cultists just... don't... GET it!
(And, or course, even if Obama HAD been Muslim, it still would
have been no harm, no foul. Since Islam is EVERY BIT as respect-
able and legitimate a religion as Christianity, or any OTHER religion.)
-- (¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯)
xanadu222@mchsi.com -- To E-Mail me.
http://www.roadrat.com -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL.
http://apifar.blogspot.com -- Great TACTICS to Fight Bigotry.
http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Christianity *vs.* Bigotry. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
z
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:05 am Post subject: Re: Great Orators of the Democratic Party |
|
|
On Nov 19, 5:37 am, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
| Quote: | • "One man with courage makes a majority."--attributed to Andrew Jackson
• "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself."--Franklin D. Roosevelt
• "The buck stops here."--Harry S. Truman
• "Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your
country."--John F. Kennedy
• "This session of the Senate should not be called a lame duck. We should
neither be lame nor should we duck the big issue facing our country."
--Barbara Mikulski
|
"I always pray, I'm like, don't let me miss the open door" -Sarah Palin |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Mason C
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:10 am Post subject: Re: Idiot rightards promote their anti-union agenda. Say wor |
|
|
On 19 Nov 2008 20:24:52 GMT, Clairbear <clair@Verizon.net> wrote:
| Quote: | sqbx@msn.com wrote in news:f2m8i4dr6645f9anllpqtcrlbteig8rlfm@4ax.com:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:27:52 -0800 (PST), cmdr buzz corey
cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote:
On Nov 18, 1:48 pm, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Yup and the greedy unions they belong to. The auto makers can't
compete in the auto market because to the insane high wages and
benefits demanded by the unions. Some high school drop out makes more
money for screwing a couple of bolts on a car frame than an engineer
with a college degree. Let the auto companies go chapter 11, let the
union cry babies lose their jobs, then the auto companies can
reorganize, hire workers who will do the job for a reasonable wage and
benefits and then the American car makers can compete.
just another senseless diatribe from a union hater.
do you have health benefits where you work?
overtime pay? a pension?
(- this is of course assuming you even HAVE a job.)
if you do, get down on your knees and thank a union member, without
whom, none of those things would ever have been possible.
Greedy? pfffft. you ignorance is showing.
unions only exist due to the greed of corporate management.
learn a little history before you eat your foot again.
Unions once seerved the good of their member but in recents years it is the
union management who has exploited their members. Also the high wages and
huge benefit packages that the unions foisted on the manufacturers in the
us has resulted in more jobs....for China and other foriegn nations. While
I hope that the Motown auto industry does not die, I believe it will take
concessions on the part of worker and smaller checks for the mismanagers of
the industry to save it.
|
And the managers still fly in their private jets?
Mason Clark
*Greater America in the Age of Rebellion*
http://frontal-lobe.info/greateramerica.html
-- many excerpts you can see -- |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Clairbear
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:23 am Post subject: Re: Idiot rightards promote their anti-union agenda. Say wor |
|
|
Mason C <masoncXXX@XXXfrontal-lobe.info> wrote in
news:29l9i414jkb24m0mbvmracbjb0sq69iigs@4ax.com:
| Quote: | On 19 Nov 2008 20:24:52 GMT, Clairbear <clair@Verizon.net> wrote:
sqbx@msn.com wrote in news:f2m8i4dr6645f9anllpqtcrlbteig8rlfm@4ax.com:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:27:52 -0800 (PST), cmdr buzz corey
cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote:
On Nov 18, 1:48 pm, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Yup and the greedy unions they belong to. The auto makers can't
compete in the auto market because to the insane high wages and
benefits demanded by the unions. Some high school drop out makes
more money for screwing a couple of bolts on a car frame than an
engineer with a college degree. Let the auto companies go chapter
11, let the union cry babies lose their jobs, then the auto
companies can reorganize, hire workers who will do the job for a
reasonable wage and benefits and then the American car makers can
compete.
just another senseless diatribe from a union hater.
do you have health benefits where you work?
overtime pay? a pension?
(- this is of course assuming you even HAVE a job.)
if you do, get down on your knees and thank a union member, without
whom, none of those things would ever have been possible.
Greedy? pfffft. you ignorance is showing.
unions only exist due to the greed of corporate management.
learn a little history before you eat your foot again.
Unions once seerved the good of their member but in recents years it
is the union management who has exploited their members. Also the high
wages and huge benefit packages that the unions foisted on the
manufacturers in the us has resulted in more jobs....for China and
other foriegn nations. While I hope that the Motown auto industry does
not die, I believe it will take concessions on the part of worker and
smaller checks for the mismanagers of the industry to save it.
And the managers still fly in their private jets?
Mason Clark
*Greater America in the Age of Rebellion*
http://frontal-lobe.info/greateramerica.html
-- many excerpts you can see --
|
Greed, hubris and arroagnce the great American business killers. The upper
mangaement of most American companies make upwards of 100 times what the
rank and file workers do. In Japan it is usually less than a 10 times
difference. And many small businesses the one Obama wants to tax so much
make littl more than their staff. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
JSM
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:42 pm Post subject: Re: First Step to GOP Recovery: Dump Hannity, Limbaugh, Ingr |
|
|
On Nov 20, 7:07 am, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Step One is to fire Rush Limbaugh and his ilk as the intellectual
bosses of the GOP.
They shouldn't be muzzled, as some liberals want to do by reviving the
"fairness doctrine" in broadcasting, just ignored more frequently.
In recent years, Republicans have let right-wing talk show hosts whip
the GOP base into frenzies -- over immigration, brain-damage victim
Terry Schiavo and same-sex marriage -- that have branded the party as
troglodyte.
The result is that the demographic groups representing the future of
American politics shifted decisively to the Democratic Party in 2008
-- Latinos, young people, the well-educated, moderates, working women,
first-time voters, suburbanites and "seculars."
As former White House political guru Karl Rove observed last week,
"the GOP will find it hard to regain the majority" if it keeps losing
Latinos.
Immigration scarcely was an issue during the fall campaign.
But the damage was done over the past two years as the radio screamers
roused the rabble, who then beat on GOP Members of Congress,
presidential candidates and even the Bush administration not just to
control the border but treat undocumented residents as felons.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/11/first_steps_to_gop_...
November 20, 2008
First Steps to GOP Recovery
By Mort Kondracke
How can the Republican Party rebound?
The first step would be to quit letting Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity
and Laura Ingraham set its agenda.
A second step would be for Congressional Republicans to actually try
to help President-elect Barack Obama succeed in addressing the
country's dire problems -- offering better ideas where appropriate and
opposing just when necessary, not reflexively.
And the third -- maybe the biggest one -- would be for GOP governors
to use their posts to show the country how conservatives can solve
problems, especially the dismal state of American education and its
menacing cousin, lagging American competitiveness.
____________________________________________________
Harry
|
Yes, by all means, we wouldn't want anybody pointing out the stupidity
of the left. [sic] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
