| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
MACK DADDY
Guest
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 2:20 am Post subject: Re: Barack is not my President |
 |
|
On Nov 15, 2:23 pm, Bert Hyman <b...@iphouse.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Innews:5NSdnZcIv70b1ILUnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@cablespeedmi.com"Clave"
ClaviusNoSpamDam...@cablespeed.com> wrote:
He was not impeached either.
Sure he was.
It's not considered impeachment unless
both houses do it eh!
I suggest you read the Constitution.
--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN b...@iphouse.com
|
I suggest your muthafuckin asses read what happened when they tried to
impeach Clinton. Looks like an unfinished impeachment to me, you
jealous, loser, fascist Republitards! |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
MACK DADDY
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 2:22 am Post subject: Re: Barack is not my President |
|
|
On Nov 15, 5:19 pm, "Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDam...@cablespeed.com>
wrote:
| Quote: | "Bert Hyman" <b...@iphouse.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9B57B57C1FE1BVeebleFetzer@216.250.184.7...
Innews:kaednfk2RIfA04LUnZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@cablespeedmi.com"Clave"
ClaviusNoSpamDam...@cablespeed.com> wrote:
"Bert Hyman" <b...@iphouse.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9B57A695C1444VeebleFetzer@216.250.184.7...
Innews:5NSdnZcIv70b1ILUnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@cablespeedmi.com"Clave"
ClaviusNoSpamDam...@cablespeed.com> wrote:
He was not impeached either.
Sure he was.
It's not considered impeachment unless
both houses do it eh!
I suggest you read the Constitution.
Get your attributions straight,
Then I suggest you either get a decent news client...
It's got nothing to do with my news client, dumbass. It has to do with your
inability to read a goddam post.
Jim- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
|
Apparently you DO have trouble reading, because you missed the part
about Clinton NOT being impeached. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Clave
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 4:13 am Post subject: Re: Barack is not my President |
|
|
"MACK DADDY" <pepsivanilla@msn.com> wrote in message
news:e04532b2-8c75-499b-8daa-e1b80c6dd45f@r36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 14, 8:23 am, Gary DeWaay <dewaay2spike...@sio.midco.net> wrote:
| Quote: | In article <9e0f41f9-c4ea-4669-a152-c2d702db96f0@
35g2000pry.googlegroups.com>, pepsivani...@msn.com MACK
DADDY says...
You are as back-ass-wards as the Wasilla Hoe, Sarah Palin. The trial
doesn't result from impeachment. Impeachment COULD result from a
trial, but in Clintons case IT DIDN'T.
This really isn't that difficult... He was impeached but
not convicted.
HTH.
|
He was not impeached either. It's not considered impeachment unless
both houses do it eh! You're just another jealous loser Republitard!
=================================================================
Hold onto that ignorance like grim death, fucktard -- without it you'd have
no personality at all.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/19/impeachment.01/
http://www.historyplace.com/unitedstates/impeachments/clinton.htm
Jim |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Bert Hyman
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 4:23 am Post subject: Re: Barack is not my President |
|
|
In news:5NSdnZcIv70b1ILUnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@cablespeedmi.com "Clave"
<ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com> wrote:
| Quote: | He was not impeached either.
|
Sure he was.
| Quote: | It's not considered impeachment unless
both houses do it eh!
|
I suggest you read the Constitution.
--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN bert@iphouse.com |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Clave
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 4:34 am Post subject: Re: Barack is not my President |
|
|
"Bert Hyman" <bert@iphouse.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9B57A695C1444VeebleFetzer@216.250.184.7...
| Quote: | In news:5NSdnZcIv70b1ILUnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@cablespeedmi.com "Clave"
ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com> wrote:
He was not impeached either.
Sure he was.
It's not considered impeachment unless
both houses do it eh!
I suggest you read the Constitution.
|
Get your attributions straight, asshole. I didn't say any of that.
Jim |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Bert Hyman
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 5:51 am Post subject: Re: Barack is not my President |
|
|
In news:kaednfk2RIfA04LUnZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@cablespeedmi.com "Clave"
<ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com> wrote:
| Quote: | "Bert Hyman" <bert@iphouse.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9B57A695C1444VeebleFetzer@216.250.184.7...
In news:5NSdnZcIv70b1ILUnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@cablespeedmi.com "Clave"
ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com> wrote:
He was not impeached either.
Sure he was.
It's not considered impeachment unless
both houses do it eh!
I suggest you read the Constitution.
Get your attributions straight,
|
Then I suggest you either get a decent news client, or learn how to use
the one you have.
Nice sig.
Followups set.
--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN bert@iphouse.com |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Clave
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 7:19 am Post subject: Re: Barack is not my President |
|
|
"Bert Hyman" <bert@iphouse.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9B57B57C1FE1BVeebleFetzer@216.250.184.7...
| Quote: | In news:kaednfk2RIfA04LUnZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@cablespeedmi.com "Clave"
ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com> wrote:
"Bert Hyman" <bert@iphouse.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9B57A695C1444VeebleFetzer@216.250.184.7...
In news:5NSdnZcIv70b1ILUnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@cablespeedmi.com "Clave"
ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com> wrote:
He was not impeached either.
Sure he was.
It's not considered impeachment unless
both houses do it eh!
I suggest you read the Constitution.
Get your attributions straight,
Then I suggest you either get a decent news client...
|
It's got nothing to do with my news client, dumbass. It has to do with your
inability to read a goddam post.
Jim |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Clave
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 8:30 am Post subject: Re: Barack is not my President |
|
|
"MACK DADDY" <pepsivanilla@msn.com> wrote in message
news:5bd58818-ac25-4cff-95da-2b4df107761e@t39g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 15, 2:23 pm, Bert Hyman <b...@iphouse.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Innews:5NSdnZcIv70b1ILUnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@cablespeedmi.com"Clave"
ClaviusNoSpamDam...@cablespeed.com> wrote:
He was not impeached either.
Sure he was.
It's not considered impeachment unless
both houses do it eh!
I suggest you read the Constitution.
--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN b...@iphouse.com
|
I suggest your muthafuckin asses read what happened when they tried to
impeach Clinton. Looks like an unfinished impeachment to me, you
jealous, loser, fascist Republitards!
==============================================================
Idiot thinks I'm a Republican too. Me.
There's just no end to the things you don't know shit about is there?
Jim |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
MACK DADDY
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 10:05 am Post subject: Re: Barack is not my President |
|
|
On Nov 14, 4:05 am, Bob <zoosqatNOS...@comcast.net> wrote:
| Quote: | On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:45:21 -0800 (PST), MACK DADDY
pepsivani...@msn.com> wrote:
On Nov 11, 2:09 pm, Crecentius Vespasianus <jazzyb...@hotmail.com
wrote:
I was wondering which NeoCon jerk here would post a comment like this
first. I remember back when Clinton was elected, you jerks would say
that he was not YOUR president. Well you need to get over it and get
a life. We are all Americans and the president is the president to all
Americans, regardless of who you voted for. When W was elected, there
was plenty of criticism of his policies and of him persoanlly by some.
But there was virtually no comments from the left saying W was not
"our" president. And I have heard severl conservative pundits accept
their defeat and admit that Obama will be THEIR president too. Why
can't you jerks online admit it also?
--------
I don't remember any criticism of George Bush in the past 8 years, but I
did remember some calls for Bill's impeachment, that was followed up by
his actual impeachment. So the criticism of Bill had some basis in
reality (the blow jobs really happened). But even Bill didn't campaign
on a platform of treason and betrayal as Barack did. Just because a
majority of the voters support his policies of treason, doesn't makes it
right. As you noticed in my original comment, I not only renounce
Barack as my President, but I also renounce the American voters who
elected him.
BILL CLINTON ACTUALLY WAS NOT IMPEACHED, YOU FASCIST BAFOON.
THERE HAS BEEN PLENTY OF COMPLAINTS ABOUT GEORGE DUMBYA BUSH. ILLEGAL
WAR STARTED ON LIES. TREASON. ILLEGAL SPYING. I WISH THE DEMOCRATS
HAD THE BALLS TO IMPEACH HIM, BECAUSE THERE CERTAINLY ARE STRONG
EVIDENCE TO IMPEACH HIM.
Go tell mommy you stuck the capslock key up your ass again.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
|
Go tell yo momma that you be a muddafuggin racist piece o shit! |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
MACK DADDY
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 10:06 am Post subject: Re: Barack is not my President |
|
|
On Nov 14, 4:28 am, Bob <zoosqatNOS...@comcast.net> wrote:
| Quote: | On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:34:11 -0800 (PST), MACK DADDY
pepsivani...@msn.com> wrote:
On Nov 12, 9:20 am, "Eddie Haskell" <nnd...@aspp.com> wrote:
bvall...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:e9e95062-6658-4723-acff-c4de83c1a5f9@1g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
.
Obama may be the President of the 62 million Americans who voted for
him, but he is not my President.
.
Don't go there. You don't have to respect the man, but you have to
respect the office.
Tell that to Clinton and the democrats.
-Eddie Haskell
Tell it to George Dumbya Fascist Douche!
Macky, ol' boy - you know you're in trouble when the message you reply
to without typing anything is more intellectually stimulating than
when you do...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
|
I always respond, so what'choo talkin' bout, willis? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
MACK DADDY
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 10:16 am Post subject: Re: Barack is not my President |
|
|
On Nov 14, 7:44 pm, chas <n...@emailreply.please> wrote:
| Quote: | MACK DADDY wrote:
On Nov 11, 2:09 pm, Crecentius Vespasianus <jazzyb...@hotmail.com
wrote:
I was wondering which NeoCon jerk here would post a comment like this
first. I remember back when Clinton was elected, you jerks would say
that he was not YOUR president. Well you need to get over it and get
a life. We are all Americans and the president is the president to all
Americans, regardless of who you voted for. When W was elected, there
was plenty of criticism of his policies and of him persoanlly by some..
But there was virtually no comments from the left saying W was not
"our" president. And I have heard severl conservative pundits accept
their defeat and admit that Obama will be THEIR president too. Why
can't you jerks online admit it also?
--------
I don't remember any criticism of George Bush in the past 8 years, but I
did remember some calls for Bill's impeachment, that was followed up by
his actual impeachment. So the criticism of Bill had some basis in
reality (the blow jobs really happened). But even Bill didn't campaign
on a platform of treason and betrayal as Barack did. Just because a
majority of the voters support his policies of treason, doesn't makes it
right. As you noticed in my original comment, I not only renounce
Barack as my President, but I also renounce the American voters who
elected him.
BILL CLINTON ACTUALLY WAS NOT IMPEACHED, YOU FASCIST BAFOON.
THERE HAS BEEN PLENTY OF COMPLAINTS ABOUT GEORGE DUMBYA BUSH. ILLEGAL
WAR STARTED ON LIES. TREASON. ILLEGAL SPYING. I WISH THE DEMOCRATS
HAD THE BALLS TO IMPEACH HIM, BECAUSE THERE CERTAINLY ARE STRONG
EVIDENCE TO IMPEACH HIM.
Bill Clinton was in fact impeached. He just was not convicted. Just
like Andrew Johnson.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
|
I don't know Andrew Johnson, kinda before my time. But I was alive
and well during the Clinton years, and I know as a fact he was not
impeached. It's kinda like if you go to a restaurant and order fish n
chips. They give you fries, but they forget to give you fish. So the
order they give you is just fries, not fish n chips. The House voted
to impeach Clinton, but the Senate did NOT. SO, he was NOT impeached! |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
MACK DADDY
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 10:17 am Post subject: Re: Barack is not my President |
|
|
On Nov 15, 4:33 am, David Hartung <da...@lemagroup.us> wrote:
| Quote: | MACK DADDY wrote:
On Nov 14, 8:23 am, Gary DeWaay <dewaay2spike...@sio.midco.net> wrote:
In article <9e0f41f9-c4ea-4669-a152-c2d702db96f0@
35g2000pry.googlegroups.com>, pepsivani...@msn.com MACK
DADDY says...
You are as back-ass-wards as the Wasilla Hoe, Sarah Palin. The trial
doesn't result from impeachment. Impeachment COULD result from a
trial, but in Clintons case IT DIDN'T.
This really isn't that difficult... He was impeached but
not convicted.
HTH.
He was not impeached either. It's not considered impeachment unless
both houses do it eh! You're just another jealous loser Republitard!
I'm sorry, but you are badly mistaken.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
|
Huh? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
MACK DADDY
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 10:20 am Post subject: Re: Barack is the President-elect.. |
|
|
On Nov 15, 7:00 am, Kurt Lochner <kurt_loch...@NOSPAMhotmail.com>
wrote:
| Quote: | David Hartung wrote:
MACK DADDY wrote:
Gary DeWaay wrote:
MACK DADDY says...
You are as back-ass-wards as the Wasilla Hoe, Sarah Palin. The trial
doesn't result from impeachment. Impeachment COULD result from a
trial, but in Clintons case IT DIDN'T.
This really isn't that difficult... He was impeached but
not convicted.
He was not impeached either. It's not considered impeachment unless
both houses do it eh! You're just another jealous loser Republitard!
I'm sorry, but you are badly mistaken.
You're mistaken again, David..
--He was impeached, and acquitted, end of story..- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
|
The thing these Republitards don't want to admit is that the acquittal
cancels out the Impeachment. It was only a half-impeachment which
didn't mean shit because the Senate acquitted him eh! |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
MACK DADDY
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 2:36 am Post subject: Re: Barack is not my President |
|
|
On Nov 17, 1:35 pm, SMITH29 <smit...@comcast.net> wrote:
| Quote: | MACK DADDY wrote:
On Nov 14, 7:44 pm, chas <n...@emailreply.please> wrote:
MACK DADDY wrote:
On Nov 11, 2:09 pm, Crecentius Vespasianus <jazzyb...@hotmail.com
wrote:
I was wondering which NeoCon jerk here would post a comment like this
first. I remember back when Clinton was elected, you jerks would say
that he was not YOUR president. Well you need to get over it and get
a life. We are all Americans and the president is the president to all
Americans, regardless of who you voted for. When W was elected, there
was plenty of criticism of his policies and of him persoanlly by some.
But there was virtually no comments from the left saying W was not
"our" president. And I have heard severl conservative pundits accept
their defeat and admit that Obama will be THEIR president too. Why
can't you jerks online admit it also?
--------
I don't remember any criticism of George Bush in the past 8 years, but I
did remember some calls for Bill's impeachment, that was followed up by
his actual impeachment. So the criticism of Bill had some basis in
reality (the blow jobs really happened). But even Bill didn't campaign
on a platform of treason and betrayal as Barack did. Just because a
majority of the voters support his policies of treason, doesn't makes it
right. As you noticed in my original comment, I not only renounce
Barack as my President, but I also renounce the American voters who
elected him.
BILL CLINTON ACTUALLY WAS NOT IMPEACHED, YOU FASCIST BAFOON.
THERE HAS BEEN PLENTY OF COMPLAINTS ABOUT GEORGE DUMBYA BUSH. ILLEGAL
WAR STARTED ON LIES. TREASON. ILLEGAL SPYING. I WISH THE DEMOCRATS
HAD THE BALLS TO IMPEACH HIM, BECAUSE THERE CERTAINLY ARE STRONG
EVIDENCE TO IMPEACH HIM.
Bill Clinton was in fact impeached. He just was not convicted. Just
like Andrew Johnson.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I don't know Andrew Johnson, kinda before my time. But I was alive
and well during the Clinton years, and I know as a fact he was not
impeached. It's kinda like if you go to a restaurant and order fish n
chips. They give you fries, but they forget to give you fish. So the
order they give you is just fries, not fish n chips. The House voted
to impeach Clinton, but the Senate did NOT. SO, he was NOT impeached!
xxxx
I wonder if bricking you would help.
29- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
|
You don't live in the USA anymore? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
SMITH29
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:35 am Post subject: Re: Barack is not my President |
|
|
MACK DADDY wrote:
| Quote: | On Nov 14, 7:44 pm, chas <n...@emailreply.please> wrote:
MACK DADDY wrote:
On Nov 11, 2:09 pm, Crecentius Vespasianus <jazzyb...@hotmail.com
wrote:
I was wondering which NeoCon jerk here would post a comment like this
first. I remember back when Clinton was elected, you jerks would say
that he was not YOUR president. Well you need to get over it and get
a life. We are all Americans and the president is the president to all
Americans, regardless of who you voted for. When W was elected, there
was plenty of criticism of his policies and of him persoanlly by some.
But there was virtually no comments from the left saying W was not
"our" president. And I have heard severl conservative pundits accept
their defeat and admit that Obama will be THEIR president too. Why
can't you jerks online admit it also?
--------
I don't remember any criticism of George Bush in the past 8 years, but I
did remember some calls for Bill's impeachment, that was followed up by
his actual impeachment. So the criticism of Bill had some basis in
reality (the blow jobs really happened). But even Bill didn't campaign
on a platform of treason and betrayal as Barack did. Just because a
majority of the voters support his policies of treason, doesn't makes it
right. As you noticed in my original comment, I not only renounce
Barack as my President, but I also renounce the American voters who
elected him.
BILL CLINTON ACTUALLY WAS NOT IMPEACHED, YOU FASCIST BAFOON.
THERE HAS BEEN PLENTY OF COMPLAINTS ABOUT GEORGE DUMBYA BUSH. ILLEGAL
WAR STARTED ON LIES. TREASON. ILLEGAL SPYING. I WISH THE DEMOCRATS
HAD THE BALLS TO IMPEACH HIM, BECAUSE THERE CERTAINLY ARE STRONG
EVIDENCE TO IMPEACH HIM.
Bill Clinton was in fact impeached. He just was not convicted. Just
like Andrew Johnson.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I don't know Andrew Johnson, kinda before my time. But I was alive
and well during the Clinton years, and I know as a fact he was not
impeached. It's kinda like if you go to a restaurant and order fish n
chips. They give you fries, but they forget to give you fish. So the
order they give you is just fries, not fish n chips. The House voted
to impeach Clinton, but the Senate did NOT. SO, he was NOT impeached!
|
xxxx
I wonder if bricking you would help.
29 |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
