| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jack
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:12 am Post subject: Army Corps of Engineers Scientist Puzzled By Pentagon 9/11 |
 |
|
During a recent "Discovery Channel" 9/11 anniversary broadcast, a U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers scientist expresses puzzlement regarding
circumstances of the discovery of the flight data recorder "black box"
allegedly belonging to American Airlines flight 77 at the Pentagon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwmjXiqr2hY |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Al Dykes
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 7:26 pm Post subject: Re: Army Corps of Engineers Scientist Puzzled By Pentagon 9/ |
|
|
In article <MZ6dnaN2x6Gyz7_UnZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@giganews.com>,
jack <jackspro@mail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | During a recent "Discovery Channel" 9/11 anniversary broadcast, a U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers scientist expresses puzzlement regarding
circumstances of the discovery of the flight data recorder "black box"
allegedly belonging to American Airlines flight 77 at the Pentagon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwmjXiqr2hY
|
Did you watch it? The scientist is in 100% agreement with the
standard story; a jet hit the building and the black boxes were
recovered.
--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
zasochimti
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:40 am Post subject: Re: Army Corps of Engineers Scientist Puzzled By Pentagon 9/ |
|
|
"Al Dykes" <adykes@panix.com> wrote in message news:gfufpu$gr0$1@panix5.panix.com...
| Quote: | In article <MZ6dnaN2x6Gyz7_UnZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@giganews.com>,
jack <jackspro@mail.com> wrote:
During a recent "Discovery Channel" 9/11 anniversary broadcast, a U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers scientist expresses puzzlement regarding
circumstances of the discovery of the flight data recorder "black box"
allegedly belonging to American Airlines flight 77 at the Pentagon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwmjXiqr2hY
Did you watch it? The scientist is in 100% agreement with the
standard story; a jet hit the building and the black boxes were
recovered.
|
Mind the word "story". So, it's not fact. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Government Shill #2
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:17 am Post subject: Re: Army Corps of Engineers Scientist Puzzled By Pentagon 9/ |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:40:53 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com>
wrote:
| Quote: |
"Al Dykes" <adykes@panix.com> wrote in message news:gfufpu$gr0$1@panix5.panix.com...
In article <MZ6dnaN2x6Gyz7_UnZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@giganews.com>,
jack <jackspro@mail.com> wrote:
During a recent "Discovery Channel" 9/11 anniversary broadcast, a U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers scientist expresses puzzlement regarding
circumstances of the discovery of the flight data recorder "black box"
allegedly belonging to American Airlines flight 77 at the Pentagon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwmjXiqr2hY
Did you watch it? The scientist is in 100% agreement with the
standard story; a jet hit the building and the black boxes were
recovered.
Mind the word "story". So, it's not fact.
|
When you are school today ask miss to explain that a story can be factual
as well as fictional. There's a good girl.
--
Shill #2
I am not young enough to know everything.
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900) |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
zasochimti
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 5:56 pm Post subject: Re: Army Corps of Engineers Scientist Puzzled By Pentagon 9/ |
|
|
"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ve0ai450bq1q4rchg1786kaesckqn6t6sq@4ax.com...
| Quote: | On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:40:53 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com
wrote:
"Al Dykes" <adykes@panix.com> wrote in message news:gfufpu$gr0$1@panix5.panix.com...
In article <MZ6dnaN2x6Gyz7_UnZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@giganews.com>,
jack <jackspro@mail.com> wrote:
During a recent "Discovery Channel" 9/11 anniversary broadcast, a U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers scientist expresses puzzlement regarding
circumstances of the discovery of the flight data recorder "black box"
allegedly belonging to American Airlines flight 77 at the Pentagon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwmjXiqr2hY
Did you watch it? The scientist is in 100% agreement with the
standard story; a jet hit the building and the black boxes were
recovered.
Mind the word "story". So, it's not fact.
When you are school today ask miss to explain that a story can be factual
as well as fictional. There's a good girl.
|
Sure, a story can be both factual as well as fictional. The only problem is
that the official bullshit conspiracy theory is much more fictional than factual.
I know it, you know it, Bush know it, Blair knows it - everyone knows it.
But, some people are being assholes about it and others ain't.
I guess your mindset that you've been displaying here for the last 7 years,
aussie, and the rhetoric you've been using to display that same mindset clearly
show in which category you belong, ain't that so?
So, now fuck off GovShill and do your bidding in order to save the oil based society.
No matter what, right? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Government Shill #2
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 6:59 pm Post subject: Re: Army Corps of Engineers Scientist Puzzled By Pentagon 9/ |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:56:32 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com>
wrote:
| Quote: |
"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ve0ai450bq1q4rchg1786kaesckqn6t6sq@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:40:53 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com
wrote:
"Al Dykes" <adykes@panix.com> wrote in message news:gfufpu$gr0$1@panix5.panix.com...
In article <MZ6dnaN2x6Gyz7_UnZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@giganews.com>,
jack <jackspro@mail.com> wrote:
During a recent "Discovery Channel" 9/11 anniversary broadcast, a U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers scientist expresses puzzlement regarding
circumstances of the discovery of the flight data recorder "black box"
allegedly belonging to American Airlines flight 77 at the Pentagon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwmjXiqr2hY
Did you watch it? The scientist is in 100% agreement with the
standard story; a jet hit the building and the black boxes were
recovered.
Mind the word "story". So, it's not fact.
When you are school today ask miss to explain that a story can be factual
as well as fictional. There's a good girl.
Sure, a story can be both factual as well as fictional. The only problem is
that the official bullshit conspiracy theory is much more fictional than factual.
|
Prove it. Provide some evidence. Some of the stuff you intend to present to
the new investigation you want to have.
| Quote: | I know it, you know it, Bush know it, Blair knows it - everyone knows it.
|
Prove it. Provide some evidence. Some of the stuff you intend to present to
the new investigation you want to have.
| Quote: | But, some people are being assholes about it and others ain't.
|
http://media.ebaumsworld.com/picture/beachbumpatrick/asshole.jpg
| Quote: | I guess your mindset that you've been displaying here for the last 7 years,
aussie, and the rhetoric you've been using to display that same mindset clearly
show in which category you belong, ain't that so?
|
Mindset? Asking you for evidence? You don't seem to understand what that
word means either, Sack-O. Maybe you should buy an English dictionary.
| Quote: | So, now fuck off GovShill and do your bidding in order to save the oil based society.
|
No.
| Quote: | No matter what, right?
|
Uh? Been to the Brad Guth School of Babble?
--
Shill #2
Against logic there is no armor like ignorance.
Laurence J. Peter (1919 - 1988) |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
BDK
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 12:02 am Post subject: Re: Army Corps of Engineers Scientist Puzzled By Pentagon 9/ |
|
|
In article <alkii4pjf8c1h681m57cf3sb90qr0viptj@4ax.com>,
gov.shill@gmail.com says...
| Quote: | On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:56:32 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com
wrote:
"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ve0ai450bq1q4rchg1786kaesckqn6t6sq@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:40:53 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com
wrote:
"Al Dykes" <adykes@panix.com> wrote in message news:gfufpu$gr0$1@panix5.panix.com...
In article <MZ6dnaN2x6Gyz7_UnZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@giganews.com>,
jack <jackspro@mail.com> wrote:
During a recent "Discovery Channel" 9/11 anniversary broadcast, a U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers scientist expresses puzzlement regarding
circumstances of the discovery of the flight data recorder "black box"
allegedly belonging to American Airlines flight 77 at the Pentagon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwmjXiqr2hY
Did you watch it? The scientist is in 100% agreement with the
standard story; a jet hit the building and the black boxes were
recovered.
Mind the word "story". So, it's not fact.
When you are school today ask miss to explain that a story can be factual
as well as fictional. There's a good girl.
Sure, a story can be both factual as well as fictional. The only problem is
that the official bullshit conspiracy theory is much more fictional than factual.
Prove it. Provide some evidence. Some of the stuff you intend to present to
the new investigation you want to have.
I know it, you know it, Bush know it, Blair knows it - everyone knows it.
Prove it. Provide some evidence. Some of the stuff you intend to present to
the new investigation you want to have.
But, some people are being assholes about it and others ain't.
http://media.ebaumsworld.com/picture/beachbumpatrick/asshole.jpg
I guess your mindset that you've been displaying here for the last 7 years,
aussie, and the rhetoric you've been using to display that same mindset clearly
show in which category you belong, ain't that so?
Mindset? Asking you for evidence? You don't seem to understand what that
word means either, Sack-O. Maybe you should buy an English dictionary.
So, now fuck off GovShill and do your bidding in order to save the oil based society.
No.
No matter what, right?
Uh? Been to the Brad Guth School of Babble?
--
Shill #2
Against logic there is no armor like ignorance.
Laurence J. Peter (1919 - 1988)
|
He's working on his BS in Guthballic Thinking.
--
BDK
BDK Klan leader?
kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Government Shill #2
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:09 am Post subject: Re: Army Corps of Engineers Scientist Puzzled By Pentagon 9/ |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:02:19 -0500, BDK <Shillkill@silentexplosions.com>
wrote:
| Quote: | In article <alkii4pjf8c1h681m57cf3sb90qr0viptj@4ax.com>,
gov.shill@gmail.com says...
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:56:32 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com
wrote:
"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ve0ai450bq1q4rchg1786kaesckqn6t6sq@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:40:53 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com
wrote:
"Al Dykes" <adykes@panix.com> wrote in message news:gfufpu$gr0$1@panix5.panix.com...
In article <MZ6dnaN2x6Gyz7_UnZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@giganews.com>,
jack <jackspro@mail.com> wrote:
During a recent "Discovery Channel" 9/11 anniversary broadcast, a U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers scientist expresses puzzlement regarding
circumstances of the discovery of the flight data recorder "black box"
allegedly belonging to American Airlines flight 77 at the Pentagon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwmjXiqr2hY
Did you watch it? The scientist is in 100% agreement with the
standard story; a jet hit the building and the black boxes were
recovered.
Mind the word "story". So, it's not fact.
When you are school today ask miss to explain that a story can be factual
as well as fictional. There's a good girl.
Sure, a story can be both factual as well as fictional. The only problem is
that the official bullshit conspiracy theory is much more fictional than factual.
Prove it. Provide some evidence. Some of the stuff you intend to present to
the new investigation you want to have.
I know it, you know it, Bush know it, Blair knows it - everyone knows it.
Prove it. Provide some evidence. Some of the stuff you intend to present to
the new investigation you want to have.
But, some people are being assholes about it and others ain't.
http://media.ebaumsworld.com/picture/beachbumpatrick/asshole.jpg
I guess your mindset that you've been displaying here for the last 7 years,
aussie, and the rhetoric you've been using to display that same mindset clearly
show in which category you belong, ain't that so?
Mindset? Asking you for evidence? You don't seem to understand what that
word means either, Sack-O. Maybe you should buy an English dictionary.
So, now fuck off GovShill and do your bidding in order to save the oil based society.
No.
No matter what, right?
Uh? Been to the Brad Guth School of Babble?
He's working on his BS in Guthballic Thinking.
|
The entry requirements to that course would be fascinating to learn.
--
Shill #2
Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
theobviousgcashman |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
BDK
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:26 am Post subject: Re: Army Corps of Engineers Scientist Puzzled By Pentagon 9/ |
|
|
In article <0iaji4pbduijsu3bvhtlr2m0k4m91qil2g@4ax.com>,
gov.shill@gmail.com says...
| Quote: | On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:02:19 -0500, BDK <Shillkill@silentexplosions.com
wrote:
In article <alkii4pjf8c1h681m57cf3sb90qr0viptj@4ax.com>,
gov.shill@gmail.com says...
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:56:32 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com
wrote:
"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ve0ai450bq1q4rchg1786kaesckqn6t6sq@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:40:53 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com
wrote:
"Al Dykes" <adykes@panix.com> wrote in message news:gfufpu$gr0$1@panix5.panix.com...
In article <MZ6dnaN2x6Gyz7_UnZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@giganews.com>,
jack <jackspro@mail.com> wrote:
During a recent "Discovery Channel" 9/11 anniversary broadcast, a U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers scientist expresses puzzlement regarding
circumstances of the discovery of the flight data recorder "black box"
allegedly belonging to American Airlines flight 77 at the Pentagon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwmjXiqr2hY
Did you watch it? The scientist is in 100% agreement with the
standard story; a jet hit the building and the black boxes were
recovered.
Mind the word "story". So, it's not fact.
When you are school today ask miss to explain that a story can be factual
as well as fictional. There's a good girl.
Sure, a story can be both factual as well as fictional. The only problem is
that the official bullshit conspiracy theory is much more fictional than factual.
Prove it. Provide some evidence. Some of the stuff you intend to present to
the new investigation you want to have.
I know it, you know it, Bush know it, Blair knows it - everyone knows it.
Prove it. Provide some evidence. Some of the stuff you intend to present to
the new investigation you want to have.
But, some people are being assholes about it and others ain't.
http://media.ebaumsworld.com/picture/beachbumpatrick/asshole.jpg
I guess your mindset that you've been displaying here for the last 7 years,
aussie, and the rhetoric you've been using to display that same mindset clearly
show in which category you belong, ain't that so?
Mindset? Asking you for evidence? You don't seem to understand what that
word means either, Sack-O. Maybe you should buy an English dictionary.
So, now fuck off GovShill and do your bidding in order to save the oil based society.
No.
No matter what, right?
Uh? Been to the Brad Guth School of Babble?
He's working on his BS in Guthballic Thinking.
The entry requirements to that course would be fascinating to learn.
--
Shill #2
Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
theobviousgcashman
|
Able to breath and babble?
Your in!
--
BDK
BDK Klan leader?
kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
zasochimti
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 11:57 pm Post subject: Re: Army Corps of Engineers Scientist Puzzled By Pentagon 9/ |
|
|
"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message news:alkii4pjf8c1h681m57cf3sb90qr0viptj@4ax.com...
| Quote: | On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:56:32 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com
wrote:
"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ve0ai450bq1q4rchg1786kaesckqn6t6sq@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:40:53 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com
wrote:
"Al Dykes" <adykes@panix.com> wrote in message news:gfufpu$gr0$1@panix5.panix.com...
In article <MZ6dnaN2x6Gyz7_UnZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@giganews.com>,
jack <jackspro@mail.com> wrote:
During a recent "Discovery Channel" 9/11 anniversary broadcast, a U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers scientist expresses puzzlement regarding
circumstances of the discovery of the flight data recorder "black box"
allegedly belonging to American Airlines flight 77 at the Pentagon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwmjXiqr2hY
Did you watch it? The scientist is in 100% agreement with the
standard story; a jet hit the building and the black boxes were
recovered.
Mind the word "story". So, it's not fact.
When you are school today ask miss to explain that a story can be factual
as well as fictional. There's a good girl.
Sure, a story can be both factual as well as fictional. The only problem is
that the official bullshit conspiracy theory is much more fictional than factual.
Prove it. Provide some evidence.
|
Take a look at any piece of live TV footage from 9.11.2001. and just watch
both of the WTC towers crumble into finest of dusts in mere seconds. Let's
say - 15 seconds. That's like 9 floors per fucking second, whacko aussie.
THAT'S my proof. And I didn't have to do jack shit. Because it's THAT obvious.
You lying cunt from Australia.
Some of the stuff you intend to present to
| Quote: | the new investigation you want to have.
|
I present you and the likes of you, whacko aussie.
That should do it for another 200 years or something...
| Quote: | I know it, you know it, Bush know it, Blair knows it - everyone knows it.
Prove it. Provide some evidence. Some of the stuff you intend to present to
the new investigation you want to have.
|
Take a look at any piece of live TV footage from 9.11.2001. and just watch
both of the WTC towers crumble into finest of dusts in mere seconds. Let's
say - 15 seconds. That's like 9 floors per fucking second, whacko aussie.
| Quote: | But, some people are being assholes about it and others ain't.
http://media.ebaumsworld.com/picture/beachbumpatrick/asshole.jpg
|
Yup, whacko aussie. You and the likes of you are being assholes when it
comes to 9/11.
And even THAT is more than obvious.
| Quote: | I guess your mindset that you've been displaying here for the last 7 years,
aussie, and the rhetoric you've been using to display that same mindset clearly
show in which category you belong, ain't that so?
Mindset? Asking you for evidence? You don't seem to understand what that
word means either, Sack-O. Maybe you should buy an English dictionary.
|
Yup, whacko aussie. MINDSET! Your MINDSET defines you as a living part of
this society. If you're a cuntnugget, like you, and you are lying your ass off day in
and day out, like you whacko aussie... yes, MINDSET is actually very, very important.
Because it puts someone like you and his/hers rhetoric/train of thought/modus operandi
in perspective.
And your perspective, whacko aussie is - lying asshole.
| Quote: | So, now fuck off GovShill and do your bidding in order to save the oil based society.
No.
|
Yes, yes. But, you being a genuine asshole of interstellar proportions...
| Quote: |
No matter what, right?
Uh? Been to the Brad Guth School of Babble?
|
Have you ever mouthed one honest word, ye grandchild of Jack The Ripper?
See? The answer to both your and my question is - no. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Al Dykes
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 12:28 am Post subject: Re: Army Corps of Engineers Scientist Puzzled By Pentagon 9/ |
|
|
In article <gh96lr$vhl$1@news.motzarella.org>,
zasochimti <zasochimti@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message news:alkii4pjf8c1h681m57cf3sb90qr0viptj@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:56:32 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com
wrote:
"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ve0ai450bq1q4rchg1786kaesckqn6t6sq@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:40:53 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com
wrote:
"Al Dykes" <adykes@panix.com> wrote in message news:gfufpu$gr0$1@panix5.panix.com...
In article <MZ6dnaN2x6Gyz7_UnZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@giganews.com>,
jack <jackspro@mail.com> wrote:
During a recent "Discovery Channel" 9/11 anniversary broadcast, a U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers scientist expresses puzzlement regarding
circumstances of the discovery of the flight data recorder "black box"
allegedly belonging to American Airlines flight 77 at the Pentagon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwmjXiqr2hY
Did you watch it? The scientist is in 100% agreement with the
standard story; a jet hit the building and the black boxes were
recovered.
Mind the word "story". So, it's not fact.
When you are school today ask miss to explain that a story can be factual
as well as fictional. There's a good girl.
Sure, a story can be both factual as well as fictional. The only problem is
that the official bullshit conspiracy theory is much more fictional than factual.
Prove it. Provide some evidence.
Take a look at any piece of live TV footage from 9.11.2001. and just watch
both of the WTC towers crumble into finest of dusts in mere seconds. Let's
say - 15 seconds. That's like 9 floors per fucking second, whacko aussie.
|
It didn't break any laws of physics.
Nobody that was an eyewitness agrees with you. Nobody with relevant
expertise agrees with the claims you parrot.
You could prove me wrong by naming someone. Lets see what their
expertise is and what they say.
--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Government Shill #2
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 12:33 am Post subject: Re: Army Corps of Engineers Scientist Puzzled By Pentagon 9/ |
|
|
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 18:57:46 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com>
wrote:
| Quote: |
"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message news:alkii4pjf8c1h681m57cf3sb90qr0viptj@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:56:32 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com
wrote:
"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ve0ai450bq1q4rchg1786kaesckqn6t6sq@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:40:53 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com
wrote:
"Al Dykes" <adykes@panix.com> wrote in message news:gfufpu$gr0$1@panix5.panix.com...
In article <MZ6dnaN2x6Gyz7_UnZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@giganews.com>,
jack <jackspro@mail.com> wrote:
During a recent "Discovery Channel" 9/11 anniversary broadcast, a U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers scientist expresses puzzlement regarding
circumstances of the discovery of the flight data recorder "black box"
allegedly belonging to American Airlines flight 77 at the Pentagon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwmjXiqr2hY
Did you watch it? The scientist is in 100% agreement with the
standard story; a jet hit the building and the black boxes were
recovered.
Mind the word "story". So, it's not fact.
When you are school today ask miss to explain that a story can be factual
as well as fictional. There's a good girl.
Sure, a story can be both factual as well as fictional. The only problem is
that the official bullshit conspiracy theory is much more fictional than factual.
Prove it. Provide some evidence.
Take a look at any piece of live TV footage from 9.11.2001. and just watch
both of the WTC towers crumble into finest of dusts in mere seconds. Let's
say - 15 seconds. That's like 9 floors per fucking second, whacko aussie.
THAT'S my proof. And I didn't have to do jack shit. Because it's THAT obvious.
|
How long should it have taken. Show your work.
| Quote: | You lying cunt from Australia.
|
Jealous? Don't live there by the way.
| Quote: | Some of the stuff you intend to present to
the new investigation you want to have.
I present you and the likes of you, whacko aussie.
|
Does no good presenting it here. Present it to your new investigation. Go!
| Quote: | That should do it for another 200 years or something...
|
Have you been on a Brad Guth Babble course?
| Quote: | I know it, you know it, Bush know it, Blair knows it - everyone knows it.
Prove it. Provide some evidence. Some of the stuff you intend to present to
the new investigation you want to have.
Take a look at any piece of live TV footage from 9.11.2001. and just watch
both of the WTC towers crumble into finest of dusts in mere seconds. Let's
say - 15 seconds. That's like 9 floors per fucking second, whacko aussie.
|
How long should it have taken. Show your work.
| Quote: | But, some people are being assholes about it and others ain't.
http://media.ebaumsworld.com/picture/beachbumpatrick/asshole.jpg
Yup, whacko aussie. You and the likes of you are being assholes when it
comes to 9/11.
|
Why do you want to put donkeys into holes. That's just cruel.
| Quote: | And even THAT is more than obvious.
I guess your mindset that you've been displaying here for the last 7 years,
aussie, and the rhetoric you've been using to display that same mindset clearly
show in which category you belong, ain't that so?
Mindset? Asking you for evidence? You don't seem to understand what that
word means either, Sack-O. Maybe you should buy an English dictionary.
Yup, whacko aussie. MINDSET! Your MINDSET defines you as a living part of
this society. If you're a cuntnugget, like you, and you are lying your ass off day in
and day out, like you whacko aussie... yes, MINDSET is actually very, very important.
Because it puts someone like you and his/hers rhetoric/train of thought/modus operandi
in perspective.
|
You really have a problem with this language, don't you Sack-o?
| Quote: | And your perspective, whacko aussie is - lying asshole.
So, now fuck off GovShill and do your bidding in order to save the oil based society.
No.
Yes, yes. But, you being a genuine asshole of interstellar proportions...
|
I don't know why I am a donkey hole. Try and explain in English.
| Quote: | No matter what, right?
Uh? Been to the Brad Guth School of Babble?
Have you ever mouthed one honest word, ye grandchild of Jack The Ripper?
See? The answer to both your and my question is - no.
|
See? No I'm afraid I don't speak Babblonian.
--
Shill #2
Roses are red,
violets are blue,
one of us is a moron,
I think that it's you. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
zasochimti
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 12:38 am Post subject: Re: Army Corps of Engineers Scientist Puzzled By Pentagon 9/ |
|
|
"Al Dykes" <adykes@panix.com> wrote in message news:gh97gq$k1$1@panix3.panix.com...
| Quote: | In article <gh96lr$vhl$1@news.motzarella.org>,
zasochimti <zasochimti@gmail.com> wrote:
"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message news:alkii4pjf8c1h681m57cf3sb90qr0viptj@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:56:32 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com
wrote:
"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ve0ai450bq1q4rchg1786kaesckqn6t6sq@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:40:53 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com
wrote:
"Al Dykes" <adykes@panix.com> wrote in message news:gfufpu$gr0$1@panix5.panix.com...
In article <MZ6dnaN2x6Gyz7_UnZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@giganews.com>,
jack <jackspro@mail.com> wrote:
During a recent "Discovery Channel" 9/11 anniversary broadcast, a U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers scientist expresses puzzlement regarding
circumstances of the discovery of the flight data recorder "black box"
allegedly belonging to American Airlines flight 77 at the Pentagon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwmjXiqr2hY
Did you watch it? The scientist is in 100% agreement with the
standard story; a jet hit the building and the black boxes were
recovered.
Mind the word "story". So, it's not fact.
When you are school today ask miss to explain that a story can be factual
as well as fictional. There's a good girl.
Sure, a story can be both factual as well as fictional. The only problem is
that the official bullshit conspiracy theory is much more fictional than factual.
Prove it. Provide some evidence.
Take a look at any piece of live TV footage from 9.11.2001. and just watch
both of the WTC towers crumble into finest of dusts in mere seconds. Let's
say - 15 seconds. That's like 9 floors per fucking second, whacko aussie.
It didn't break any laws of physics.
Nobody that was an eyewitness agrees with you. Nobody with relevant
expertise agrees with the claims you parrot.
You could prove me wrong by naming someone. Lets see what their
expertise is and what they say.
|
Kill yourself, Dykes. Do everyone a huge favor.
Seriously. This is not an ad hominem attack.
Seriously. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
BDK
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 8:48 am Post subject: Re: Army Corps of Engineers Scientist Puzzled By Pentagon 9/ |
|
|
In article <cb8gj45erl7fqgt6ql43mqkffj9s5hteki@4ax.com>,
gov.shill@gmail.com says...
| Quote: | On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 18:57:46 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com
wrote:
"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message news:alkii4pjf8c1h681m57cf3sb90qr0viptj@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:56:32 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com
wrote:
"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ve0ai450bq1q4rchg1786kaesckqn6t6sq@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:40:53 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com
wrote:
"Al Dykes" <adykes@panix.com> wrote in message news:gfufpu$gr0$1@panix5.panix.com...
In article <MZ6dnaN2x6Gyz7_UnZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@giganews.com>,
jack <jackspro@mail.com> wrote:
During a recent "Discovery Channel" 9/11 anniversary broadcast, a U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers scientist expresses puzzlement regarding
circumstances of the discovery of the flight data recorder "black box"
allegedly belonging to American Airlines flight 77 at the Pentagon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwmjXiqr2hY
Did you watch it? The scientist is in 100% agreement with the
standard story; a jet hit the building and the black boxes were
recovered.
Mind the word "story". So, it's not fact.
When you are school today ask miss to explain that a story can be factual
as well as fictional. There's a good girl.
Sure, a story can be both factual as well as fictional. The only problem is
that the official bullshit conspiracy theory is much more fictional than factual.
Prove it. Provide some evidence.
Take a look at any piece of live TV footage from 9.11.2001. and just watch
both of the WTC towers crumble into finest of dusts in mere seconds. Let's
say - 15 seconds. That's like 9 floors per fucking second, whacko aussie.
THAT'S my proof. And I didn't have to do jack shit. Because it's THAT obvious.
How long should it have taken. Show your work.
You lying cunt from Australia.
Jealous? Don't live there by the way.
Some of the stuff you intend to present to
the new investigation you want to have.
I present you and the likes of you, whacko aussie.
Does no good presenting it here. Present it to your new investigation. Go!
That should do it for another 200 years or something...
Have you been on a Brad Guth Babble course?
I know it, you know it, Bush know it, Blair knows it - everyone knows it.
Prove it. Provide some evidence. Some of the stuff you intend to present to
the new investigation you want to have.
Take a look at any piece of live TV footage from 9.11.2001. and just watch
both of the WTC towers crumble into finest of dusts in mere seconds. Let's
say - 15 seconds. That's like 9 floors per fucking second, whacko aussie.
How long should it have taken. Show your work.
But, some people are being assholes about it and others ain't.
http://media.ebaumsworld.com/picture/beachbumpatrick/asshole.jpg
Yup, whacko aussie. You and the likes of you are being assholes when it
comes to 9/11.
Why do you want to put donkeys into holes. That's just cruel.
And even THAT is more than obvious.
I guess your mindset that you've been displaying here for the last 7 years,
aussie, and the rhetoric you've been using to display that same mindset clearly
show in which category you belong, ain't that so?
Mindset? Asking you for evidence? You don't seem to understand what that
word means either, Sack-O. Maybe you should buy an English dictionary.
Yup, whacko aussie. MINDSET! Your MINDSET defines you as a living part of
this society. If you're a cuntnugget, like you, and you are lying your ass off day in
and day out, like you whacko aussie... yes, MINDSET is actually very, very important.
Because it puts someone like you and his/hers rhetoric/train of thought/modus operandi
in perspective.
You really have a problem with this language, don't you Sack-o?
And your perspective, whacko aussie is - lying asshole.
So, now fuck off GovShill and do your bidding in order to save the oil based society.
No.
Yes, yes. But, you being a genuine asshole of interstellar proportions...
I don't know why I am a donkey hole. Try and explain in English.
No matter what, right?
Uh? Been to the Brad Guth School of Babble?
Have you ever mouthed one honest word, ye grandchild of Jack The Ripper?
See? The answer to both your and my question is - no.
See? No I'm afraid I don't speak Babblonian.
--
Shill #2
Roses are red,
violets are blue,
one of us is a moron,
I think that it's you.
|
Sack is being overhadowed by the new breed of kooktards, the Obama BC
believing kooks make him look like an "amateur". I'm sure he considers
himself a professional whatever, just as we a professional kooktard, but
his insults are getting stale...
I thought it was babbleloonian, BTW.
--
BDK
BDK Klan leader?
kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Government Shill #2
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 8:48 am Post subject: Re: Army Corps of Engineers Scientist Puzzled By Pentagon 9/ |
|
|
On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 01:02:16 -0500, BDK <Shillkill@silentexplosions.com>
wrote:
| Quote: | In article <cb8gj45erl7fqgt6ql43mqkffj9s5hteki@4ax.com>,
gov.shill@gmail.com says...
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 18:57:46 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com
wrote:
"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message news:alkii4pjf8c1h681m57cf3sb90qr0viptj@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:56:32 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com
wrote:
"Government Shill #2" <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ve0ai450bq1q4rchg1786kaesckqn6t6sq@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:40:53 +0100, "zasochimti" <zasochimti@gmail.com
wrote:
"Al Dykes" <adykes@panix.com> wrote in message news:gfufpu$gr0$1@panix5.panix.com...
In article <MZ6dnaN2x6Gyz7_UnZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@giganews.com>,
jack <jackspro@mail.com> wrote:
During a recent "Discovery Channel" 9/11 anniversary broadcast, a U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers scientist expresses puzzlement regarding
circumstances of the discovery of the flight data recorder "black box"
allegedly belonging to American Airlines flight 77 at the Pentagon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwmjXiqr2hY
Did you watch it? The scientist is in 100% agreement with the
standard story; a jet hit the building and the black boxes were
recovered.
Mind the word "story". So, it's not fact.
When you are school today ask miss to explain that a story can be factual
as well as fictional. There's a good girl.
Sure, a story can be both factual as well as fictional. The only problem is
that the official bullshit conspiracy theory is much more fictional than factual.
Prove it. Provide some evidence.
Take a look at any piece of live TV footage from 9.11.2001. and just watch
both of the WTC towers crumble into finest of dusts in mere seconds. Let's
say - 15 seconds. That's like 9 floors per fucking second, whacko aussie.
THAT'S my proof. And I didn't have to do jack shit. Because it's THAT obvious.
How long should it have taken. Show your work.
You lying cunt from Australia.
Jealous? Don't live there by the way.
Some of the stuff you intend to present to
the new investigation you want to have.
I present you and the likes of you, whacko aussie.
Does no good presenting it here. Present it to your new investigation. Go!
That should do it for another 200 years or something...
Have you been on a Brad Guth Babble course?
I know it, you know it, Bush know it, Blair knows it - everyone knows it.
Prove it. Provide some evidence. Some of the stuff you intend to present to
the new investigation you want to have.
Take a look at any piece of live TV footage from 9.11.2001. and just watch
both of the WTC towers crumble into finest of dusts in mere seconds. Let's
say - 15 seconds. That's like 9 floors per fucking second, whacko aussie.
How long should it have taken. Show your work.
But, some people are being assholes about it and others ain't.
http://media.ebaumsworld.com/picture/beachbumpatrick/asshole.jpg
Yup, whacko aussie. You and the likes of you are being assholes when it
comes to 9/11.
Why do you want to put donkeys into holes. That's just cruel.
And even THAT is more than obvious.
I guess your mindset that you've been displaying here for the last 7 years,
aussie, and the rhetoric you've been using to display that same mindset clearly
show in which category you belong, ain't that so?
Mindset? Asking you for evidence? You don't seem to understand what that
word means either, Sack-O. Maybe you should buy an English dictionary.
Yup, whacko aussie. MINDSET! Your MINDSET defines you as a living part of
this society. If you're a cuntnugget, like you, and you are lying your ass off day in
and day out, like you whacko aussie... yes, MINDSET is actually very, very important.
Because it puts someone like you and his/hers rhetoric/train of thought/modus operandi
in perspective.
You really have a problem with this language, don't you Sack-o?
And your perspective, whacko aussie is - lying asshole.
So, now fuck off GovShill and do your bidding in order to save the oil based society.
No.
Yes, yes. But, you being a genuine asshole of interstellar proportions...
I don't know why I am a donkey hole. Try and explain in English.
No matter what, right?
Uh? Been to the Brad Guth School of Babble?
Have you ever mouthed one honest word, ye grandchild of Jack The Ripper?
See? The answer to both your and my question is - no.
See? No I'm afraid I don't speak Babblonian.
Sack is being overhadowed by the new breed of kooktards, the Obama BC
believing kooks make him look like an "amateur". I'm sure he considers
himself a professional whatever, just as we a professional kooktard, but
his insults are getting stale...
|
Yes, I've warned her that her place as one of the top ten kOOks is under
threat. That's what she gets for disappearing for a week or two.
| Quote: | I thought it was babbleloonian, BTW.
|
Is that the Croatian sub-dialect?
--
Shill #2
Pfft...English! Who needs that? I'm never going to England.
Homer J. Simpson |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
